Sometimes when you are saving the planet, you just have to knock 2.1° C off of the 1940 temperature.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Jack the Insider on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
And they are still unable to explain the blip. The same lack of knowledge prevents accurate climate modelling.
Thanks for the reminder. Not that I forgot, but just like commercial advertising it helps to see the message more than once.
Keep hammering away. The battering ram doesn’t break through on the first bump.
Until climate scientists can deal with the PDO, make proper adjustments for UHI and get rid of unjustified adjustments, they will continue to be judged as alarmists prostituting themselves for research dollars and not true science.
Don’t forget solar and earth core heat variations.
Can’t just say they don’t matter because you haven’t figured out how the might be important.
The=they.
You display your research in such fascinating graphics. Only a “tripped-out” (on kool-aid) fanatical Warmist could DENY the blatant “tampering”.
Steve,
O/T and FYI
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/come-shoot-me-s.html#comments
Just for reference: What are the dates for the sources of the first and second graphs in the animation?
GISS V2 vs. V3
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=620040300000&dt=1&ds=1
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=620040300000&dt=1&ds=14
Thanks. This led me to this WUWT article:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/09/26/nasa-giss-caught-changing-past-data-again-violates-data-quality-act/
For those who are curious: v3 was apparently released in November 2011.
Let’s face it, despite all the BS that is being spouted, there very little understanding of climate-past, present or future. At best it is all speculation.
But I bet you would agree that the range of temperatures from the past has been great enough to dispel any notion that massive out-of- control feedbacks will ever occur.