http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/archives/long_lead/gifs/
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Communist West Germany
- Earth On Fire
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
Recent Comments
- Greg in NZ on Earth On Fire
- arn on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- William on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- William on Earth On Fire
- arn on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Mike on NPR Climate Experts
- Mike on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- mwhite on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
They will probably try and block you for anything from now on. Your too much of a menace to them by telling the truth. Time to get on to Inhofe ect
you’re
etc.
It should say “Congress has cut off funding for this phoney long range projection. You will need to buy your own hockey sticks from now on. We suggest Dicks Sporting Goods.”
Curious
The other explanation is that long range doesn’t agree with CAGW therefore you can’t be trusted to look at it . You might misinterpret the data. So they have to adjust the adjustments again. It’ll take some time, but just as soon as they do, the info will be available again.
I can assure you that if the long range forecast had agreed with CAGW it’d be all over the news.
Is there any chance that the following link now has the same information?
(Although accessed in a different manner)
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/archives/long_lead/llarc.ind.php
Without knowing what you used to get there, I cannot be certain.
Farmer’s Almanac is far more accurate. Maybe the Farmer’s Almanac showed be made the official weather forecaster since the NOAA has become a “money pit”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It’s a common and recommended practice to block directory access in webservers. All websites RFC:SHOULD do it. If the filename format is regular and known, you can just fill that in with dates to find what you want if it’s there. Insinuating a good web security practice is anything else is tinfoil hat territory.
Tony … intellicast still has updated NOAA links but I don’t know if it is the same as what u were after
http://www.intellicast.com/National/Temperature/Departure10.aspx
To get to the links you need to go into national, into temperature, into 10 or 30 or 90 day.
After last year, when they predicted a much above normal winter for the Midwest, they have apparently punted.
Looks like they moved it.
When does government ever admit a mistake?