http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/archives/long_lead/gifs/
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
Recent Comments
- Mike Haseler (Scottish Sceptic) on Back To The Future
- Tel on Back To The Future
- arn on Back To The Future
- Walter on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Bob G on Back To The Future
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- Brodirt on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
They will probably try and block you for anything from now on. Your too much of a menace to them by telling the truth. Time to get on to Inhofe ect
you’re
etc.
It should say “Congress has cut off funding for this phoney long range projection. You will need to buy your own hockey sticks from now on. We suggest Dicks Sporting Goods.”
Curious
The other explanation is that long range doesn’t agree with CAGW therefore you can’t be trusted to look at it . You might misinterpret the data. So they have to adjust the adjustments again. It’ll take some time, but just as soon as they do, the info will be available again.
I can assure you that if the long range forecast had agreed with CAGW it’d be all over the news.
Is there any chance that the following link now has the same information?
(Although accessed in a different manner)
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/archives/long_lead/llarc.ind.php
Without knowing what you used to get there, I cannot be certain.
Farmer’s Almanac is far more accurate. Maybe the Farmer’s Almanac showed be made the official weather forecaster since the NOAA has become a “money pit”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It’s a common and recommended practice to block directory access in webservers. All websites RFC:SHOULD do it. If the filename format is regular and known, you can just fill that in with dates to find what you want if it’s there. Insinuating a good web security practice is anything else is tinfoil hat territory.
Tony … intellicast still has updated NOAA links but I don’t know if it is the same as what u were after
http://www.intellicast.com/National/Temperature/Departure10.aspx
To get to the links you need to go into national, into temperature, into 10 or 30 or 90 day.
After last year, when they predicted a much above normal winter for the Midwest, they have apparently punted.
Looks like they moved it.
When does government ever admit a mistake?