http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/archives/long_lead/gifs/
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- GW on A Giant Eyesore
- conrad ziefle on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Greg in NZ on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- czechlist on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- arn on COP29 Preview
- arn on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on Making Themselves Irrelevant
They will probably try and block you for anything from now on. Your too much of a menace to them by telling the truth. Time to get on to Inhofe ect
you’re
etc.
It should say “Congress has cut off funding for this phoney long range projection. You will need to buy your own hockey sticks from now on. We suggest Dicks Sporting Goods.”
Curious
The other explanation is that long range doesn’t agree with CAGW therefore you can’t be trusted to look at it . You might misinterpret the data. So they have to adjust the adjustments again. It’ll take some time, but just as soon as they do, the info will be available again.
I can assure you that if the long range forecast had agreed with CAGW it’d be all over the news.
Is there any chance that the following link now has the same information?
(Although accessed in a different manner)
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/archives/long_lead/llarc.ind.php
Without knowing what you used to get there, I cannot be certain.
Farmer’s Almanac is far more accurate. Maybe the Farmer’s Almanac showed be made the official weather forecaster since the NOAA has become a “money pit”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It’s a common and recommended practice to block directory access in webservers. All websites RFC:SHOULD do it. If the filename format is regular and known, you can just fill that in with dates to find what you want if it’s there. Insinuating a good web security practice is anything else is tinfoil hat territory.
Tony … intellicast still has updated NOAA links but I don’t know if it is the same as what u were after
http://www.intellicast.com/National/Temperature/Departure10.aspx
To get to the links you need to go into national, into temperature, into 10 or 30 or 90 day.
After last year, when they predicted a much above normal winter for the Midwest, they have apparently punted.
Looks like they moved it.
When does government ever admit a mistake?