http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/archives/long_lead/gifs/
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- Macha on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- JohnFrancis on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- John Francis on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Stuart Hamish on Extreme Weather
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime
- arn on Analyzing Big City Crime
- Gordon Vigurs on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Gordon Vigurs on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- conrad ziefle on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- arn on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
They will probably try and block you for anything from now on. Your too much of a menace to them by telling the truth. Time to get on to Inhofe ect
you’re
etc.
It should say “Congress has cut off funding for this phoney long range projection. You will need to buy your own hockey sticks from now on. We suggest Dicks Sporting Goods.”
Curious
The other explanation is that long range doesn’t agree with CAGW therefore you can’t be trusted to look at it . You might misinterpret the data. So they have to adjust the adjustments again. It’ll take some time, but just as soon as they do, the info will be available again.
I can assure you that if the long range forecast had agreed with CAGW it’d be all over the news.
Is there any chance that the following link now has the same information?
(Although accessed in a different manner)
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/archives/long_lead/llarc.ind.php
Without knowing what you used to get there, I cannot be certain.
Farmer’s Almanac is far more accurate. Maybe the Farmer’s Almanac showed be made the official weather forecaster since the NOAA has become a “money pit”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It’s a common and recommended practice to block directory access in webservers. All websites RFC:SHOULD do it. If the filename format is regular and known, you can just fill that in with dates to find what you want if it’s there. Insinuating a good web security practice is anything else is tinfoil hat territory.
Tony … intellicast still has updated NOAA links but I don’t know if it is the same as what u were after
http://www.intellicast.com/National/Temperature/Departure10.aspx
To get to the links you need to go into national, into temperature, into 10 or 30 or 90 day.
After last year, when they predicted a much above normal winter for the Midwest, they have apparently punted.
Looks like they moved it.
When does government ever admit a mistake?