Only 52% of American Meteorological Society members believe that global warming is primarily Mann-made, and only 78% of their members who get paid to produce global warming propaganda do.
According to Kook and Nutter, this is a 97% consensus.
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00091.1
Upon further review, the 97% consensus is total BS, but the alarmists still insist it is true. Who are the deniers now?
Global Warming is 97% Fraud…
If these CO2 Downwelling graphs are correct… well… CO2 is a minor Greenhouse Gas and 200ppm, 1000ppm… doesn’t really matter…
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/?s=co2+downwelling
You AND the Ipcc are horrible in math.
That’s the reason.
52%+78%= 130%
this means that 1.3 out of 1 scientist believe in global warming.
(and that’s far more probable than to believe that 1/10000 of co2 will heat the earth up
to 4 degrees while ignoring that the trillions of tons of climate gas(water) or the main energy source(sun) or the fact that climate has always changed since earth exist + there is even not a plausible explanation why the current climate is the best for humanity and must not change)
Over 90% of available answers on that survey affirm the myth of “global warming.” Confidence in an unbiased result is therefore less than 10%.
A lot to consider – From the report:” First, even though the response rate to our survey was well within the normative range, nearly three quarters of the AMS members invited to participate did not do so. This raises the possibility that our respondents may not accurately represent the views of the broader AMS membership.”
I wonder if funding source for research and publication should be included as another variable in consensus building – I’ll bet a VERY strong correlation.
Boy wouldn’t that set the cat among the pigeons!
It is always interesting how a government paid academic scientist is thought not to have a vested interest.
Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
Actually its all very simple its the new Common Core math. in the units place we had 5 and to which gives us 7 then in the tens place we add 2 to 7 which gives us 9 so the answer is 97 see that wasn’t hard at all.
Not sure what happened but it was suppose to be:
Actually its all very simple its the new Common Core math. in the units place we add 2 to 5 which gives us 7 then in the tens place we add 2 to 7 which gives us 9 so the answer is 97 see that wasn’t hard at all.
Reblogged this on Globalcooler's Weblog.