“Some of the most compelling evidence of global warming comes to us from NASA”
Very true. NASA data tampering has doubled 1890-1980 warming since 1981.
“Some of the most compelling evidence of global warming comes to us from NASA”
Very true. NASA data tampering has doubled 1890-1980 warming since 1981.
“Some of the most compelling evidence of ghosts comes to us from ghosthunters”
Boo!
I never suspected that Hanoi was in Manchuria! I gotta learn map reading again!
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056218/
That is why he was called the Manchurian candidate and why I refused to vote for him. It was the first time I ever voted third party.
As I wrote cooler in the west US and Europe.
Circulation along the yellow area.
http://www.cpc.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/strat_a_f/gif_files/gfs_toz_nh_f00.gif
http://oi59.tinypic.com/2ailbg3.jpg
Click the graphic.
If you look at graphs of past ages, the “hockey stick” was the norm. Only in recent centuries has climate been calmer, allowing human progress to develop and population growth to explode. We should welcome the return of the hockey stick to keep human parasites in check.
To save the Earth from human parasites, why are Warmists warning us about “climate change” with science fiction doomsday press releases? Wouldn’t it be better for the planet in the long run if humans continued (allegedly) causing natural disasters, sea level rise, etc reducing human population like the Black Death in the Middle Ages? The Earth will survive and recover if those allegations are true.
As a compromise, the two sides — Warmists and Deniers — should privately agree on global warming, but only if Warmists stop trying to warn everybody, and all climate funding and green energy subsidies are halted. The Earth will win in the end.
Your thoughts?
If Warmists refuse, then we’ll know their true motives are a one-world gov’t to develop and industrialize 3rd World as they have been since colonial times. And that’ll increase CO2 even more. It’s just about money and power, the redistribution wolf with a new mask.
Thanks, Steven, for your ability to see and the courage to tell the public the “science” of Big Brother is like the “new suit” of imaginary cloth worn by the Emperor in Hans Christian Anderson’s classic children’s tale.
John McCain is not to blame for believing that NASA tells the truth.
Omanuel—I know of no politician, actor or media person, who knows anything about the nature of the so called green house effect.
Nor do the vast majority of scientists who postulate about it.
Nor do they realize the necessary blessing that it is for life to exist on earth as we know it.
I am very much in agreement those who say regarding the science of climate change that it is very much governed by unknowns and also unknown unknowns.
The statement made by Scientific Institutions in the United States that……
THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED.
Is antithetical to the scientific process in general and more so to the science of climate change.
A combination of egos, money, and the crystallization of the warnings of D. Eisenhower
have made a mockery of the science.
The original draft of Ike’s famous speech also included a warning about government and media collusion, but his advisers convinced him to edit that part out. Ike should have listened to his gut, and ignored the circle of hand wringers.
Ike’s famous speech included a warning about federal research funds corrupting science:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOLld5PR4ts
Omanuel,
John McCain, his father and grandfather were all career US Navy officers. They worked and were raised on US Government and if your “is not to blame for believing that NASA” or any other part of the government to to be believed by us, then the only other option is –
John McCain is too stupid for believing that NASA tells the truth.
John McCain is a nutcase.
Yup.
To see how crazy Google: McCain ISIS photo
Also NASA = Never A Straight Answer
@ gator69
Ike’s famous farewell speech included a warning about the corruption of science with federal research grant funds.
Please remind me to find and post Eisenhower’s 1961 speech here.
I posted it above.