The dictator just issued some more CO2 regulations. They have absolutely nothing to do with climate. By the year 2030, China will emit four times as much CO2 as the US. Anything the US does is in the noise.
Why do Republicans in Congress insist on referring to them as “climate regulations?”
The Republicans in congress are frauds. Just rolling out the red carpet for Obama.
I’m going to give them the benefit of the doubt. It may just be that they currently just can’t beat this Democrat Party, Media, and leftist-Green triumvirate that currently rules our culture. Maybe we the people haven’t done enough either.
The fake “conservative” Republicans running the party now are happy to be crony capitalists for the government mandated “green” solutions.
http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/obama-crony-capitalism-and-green-tech-failures.html
Paranoia and PTSD- like symptoms may result from realization of the full extent of worldwide government deceit after Stalin emerged victorious from the ruins of WWII to unite nations (UN) and national academies of science (NAS) into a giant “Orwellian Ministry of Consensus Science (UN)Truths“ on October 24, 1945.
(In 1946 George Orwell moved from London to the Scottish Isle of Jura to start writing a warning to the public in the futuristic novel that describes the current, one-world totalitarian government so well, “Nineteen Eighty-Four”)
Post-WWII science has confirmed Philip Snowden’s insight (July 1916): “Truth, it has been said, is the first casualty of war.”
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/08/08/national/history/truth-hurts-censorship-media/?utm_source=Daily+News+Updates&utm_campaign=967a302fd1-Sunday_email_updates09_08_2015&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c5a6080d40-967a302fd1-332818853#.VcY-ldm9Kc1
And post-WWII science has now confirmed this ancient scriptural teaching (Mundaka Upanishads 3.1.6): “Truth is victorious, never untruth.”
If GOD is the Creator, Destroyer and Sustainer of atoms and lives then the REALITY revealed by experimentation and observation bears a truly remarkable resemblance to the GOD revealed by prayer, contemplation and meditation, . . .
and TRUTH is revealed even if public funds are futilely squandered to hide TRUTH.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy.pdf
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/08/08/spectacular-climate-fraud-from-national-geographic/
http://whowhatwhy.org/2015/08/06/classic-www-hiroshimanagasaki-atomic-devastation-hidden-for-decades/
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/08/07/how-climate-scientists-cheat-and-deceive/
It is all about redistribution of wealth in a global community of communists.
Democrats and Republicans, Liberals and Conservatives, Capitalists and Communists apparently all agreed on 24 Oct 1945: “Better Red Than Dead !”
There may have been a brief pause in globalization plans when John F. Kennedy was president in 1960-1963.
Well, interms of CO2 emissions from coal, China has produced and used 4x as much as the USA for years now
and while the united states is closing coal fired power stations,the germans are building new ones. the world has gone completely insane.
Just more enslavement coming our way.
The eugenics crowd is having a ball of a time with this. Assuming, of course, you already knew that forced mass-depopulation plans have been underway for many years now.
The only source of food on this Earth is via PHOTOSYNTHESIS from H2O and CO2.
It is ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL that we never allow the atmospheric CO2 concentration to drop below 350ppm ever again if we want to feed the world’s growing population.
The aim should actually be to lift it to 700+ ppm.
1000
Hey, I did put the + sign !! 🙂
As I think I said before.. I first used the 700+ ppm message on a 350.org site…. and promptly got banned 😉
So, if you don’t mind, I will stick to the 700+ppm wording, even though we know that higher would be better.
1500 ppm to 2000 ppm would really make plants happy.
Optimal levels of atmospheric CO2 concentrations are at about 1500 ppm. Green plants are actually starving at concentrations less than 500 ppm. – This is probably one of the main reasons why I am seeing so many trees with over fifty percent of their crowns dead or dying, when they should be otherwise thriving!
Plus,
Our best production through agriculture, was when atmospheric CO2 levels were around 800 to 1200 ppm. – Now, where these levels are closer to about 400 ppm CO2 today, we are seeing the virtual “crashing” of agriculture around the world (plus the added problems of pesticide/herbicide/fungicide accumulation in the various soils, and “super-bugs/weeds”). This CO2-elimination scheme is literally starving us all to death!
Fortunately China and India are doing their fair share of the CO2 production, and the moronic stupidity of the EU and US carbon dioxide reduction schemes will only have a very minimal effect. 🙂 (expect of course to destroy the EU and US economies.)
Eventually,
Even China and India will see their industrial activity greatly reduced once the globalists decide they have enough commercial activity for their own needs, and to hell with everyone else’s.
Re: AndyG55 August 28, 2015 11:03 am
It appears I am banned on not_alot_of_people. Here is your answer
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00091.1
http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2013/11/28/taylor-distorts-poll-of-meteorologists-on-climate-change/
We found that more than 9 out of 10 climate science experts (93%) who publish mostly on climate change, and the same proportion (93%) of climate experts who publish mostly on other topics, were convinced that humans have contributed to global warming. We also found that about 8 out of 10 meteorologists and atmospheric scientists who publish on climate (79%) or other topics (78%) were convinced that humans have contributed to global warming. Lastly, we found that the group least likely to be convinced that humans have contributed to global warming was AMS members who do not publish research in the peer-reviewed scientific literature; only six out of 10 AMS members in this group (62%) were convinced.
Re: AndyG55 August 28, 2015 11:03 am
Members of the AAPG did force their leaders to change the association’s position.
http://clasticdetritus.com/2007/10/27/global-warming-and-petroleum-geology/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change
—
Prior to the adoption of this statement, the AAPG was the only major scientific organization that rejected the finding of significant human influence on recent climate, according to a statement by the Council of the American Quaternary Association.[13] Explaining the plan for a revision, AAPG president Lee Billingsly wrote in March 2007:
Members have threatened to not renew their memberships… if AAPG does not alter its position on global climate change… And I have been told of members who already have resigned in previous years because of our current global climate change position… The current policy statement is not supported by a significant number of our members and prospective members.
—
Hence, abortion. Even partial birth.
Where there is huge profit to be made,
Guaranteed there is corruption shortly behind it.
But down here,
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/08/04/wind-subsidies-to-be-cut-in-australia/#comments
As I’ve said before..
Peak Renewables will be when the subsidies and mandated feed-in are removed. 🙂
as soon as the connected money gets moved out of renewables it will be game over . while we have western leaders with close family members benefiting greatly from the subsidies,and well connected companies being paid to keep diesel generators on standby in the uk the subsidies will keep rolling in.
despite living in scotland ,i really hope the uk has a proper winter this year,it will highlight the sheer stupidity in the lack of investment in recent decades in reliable energy sources while showing the climate aint changed that much.
I heat my Northeast house with coal in winter. I am terrified this will be forbidden.
Jeb Bush on climate change:
“The climate is changing, and I’m concerned about that. We need to work with the rest of the world to negotiate a way to reduce carbon emissions.” -Jeb Bush, April 2015
~
Trump on climate change:
“This very expensive GLOBAL WARMING bullshit has got to stop.” -Donald Trump
“Surprise? 1970’s global cooling alarmists were pushing the same no-growth liberal agenda as today’s global warming.” -Donald Trump
“Obama’s speech on climate change was scary. It will lower our standard of living and raise costs of fuel & food for everyone.” -Donald Trump
“Gore wants us to clean up our factories and plants in order to protect us from global warming, when China and other countries couldn’t care less. It would make us totally non-competitive in the manufacturing world, and China, Japan and India are laughing at America’s stupidity.” -Donald Trump
“With the coldest winter ever recorded, with snow setting record levels up and down the coast, the Nobel committee should take the Nobel Prize back from Al Gore.” -Donald Trump
“The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.” -Donald Trump
Hell yeah!!!
Meanwhile July comes in 9th or 10th warmest since reliable records started in 1979, in RSS, UAH and NOAA/NCEP/CFSv2..
Zero trend period 18years and 5 or 6 months.
https://wobleibtdieglobaleerwaermung.wordpress.com/2015/08/04/global-warming-reality-check-juli-2015-die-globale-abkuehlung-seit-1998-dauert-an-uah-018/
Yes indeed, “Where is the Global Warming?” Nice site. Thanks. Oder, danke sehr!
Maybe four times the emissions,
Maybe four times the brains,
Perhaps China will throw off
Agenda 21’s chains!
http://rhymeafterrhyme.net/theres-something-afoot/
The president’s policies make no sense:
https://www.aei.org/publication/president-obamas-clean-power-plan-all-cost-no-benefit/
“China will emit four times as much CO2 as the US. Anything the US does is in the noise.”
Lets say that pound for pound China is going to consume four times as much in terms of fossil fuels…..
Is the US willing to pay the inflated prices which will without doubt come as a result of China’s need for fossil fuels ? Feel free to compete , it is your money and your choice about how you spend it.
Some level headed analyst will no doubt speak up and say that there is more than enough for everyone such that the price can stay low…..but that sort of analyst forgets that the rate of consumption drives the rate of production – and the rate of production, especially with oilfields which have passed peak production, I doubt, can produce more than required at a given time in order to keep the free market free flowing……..the highest bidder will win, as per usual
Look what happened recently when the oil price slumped – shale oil production became unprofitable for over 95% of shale fields in the US….oh dear……that should be enough to highlight how thin this razor’s edge is.
I see the CO2 is the “new hit in town”, especially for politicians. Everybody is emitting it, everybody is counting it. Still, not everybody is thinking objectively about it. If you think about the past century climate and try to explain the 20th century climate, you will see that our CO2 is almost harmless. We should instead think about oceans and their influence on the climate: http://www.seaclimate.com.
JoNova found the real cause.
http://jonova.s3.amazonaws.com/graphs/temp-co2/us_post_causes_global_warming.gif
Hey I just put in a new mail box for my humble abode last weekend. Had the post made at my families business and then powder coated to match the shutters and the new cloths line posts I put in. Already had a mail box that matched.
Had the thing made with a plate protecting the box. During the winter when the snow plow goes by at 30 mph and throws wet snow up it bashes in the side of the mail boxes. I won’t have the problem now. And if any heathens drive by with a baseball bat and take a swing they really are going to be sorry. 3/16″ plate repels baseball bats pretty effectively. I imagine it would work just as well for cricket bats for our Anglo and Aussie friends.
BTW for those that don’t know, according to the program “How it’s Made”, it was our British friends that came up with the idea of the modern paper envelope. They were the first ones to come up with postal stamps and so the folded letter with the wax seal went by the wayside so they had some place to put a stamp and cancel it without defiling the actual document. But the concept of envelopes has been around since the clay tablet!