What Really Drives The Climate?

The belief that carbon dioxide controls earth’s temperature is a superstition which has no basis in science. A civilization which bases policy on superstition is doomed to failure.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to What Really Drives The Climate?

  1. Billyjack says:

    NASA is so brilliant they couldn’t figure out how to make a $20 O-ring seal work with a $450 million budget. These are the same geniuses that forgot the check the optics on a $1.5 billion space telescope.

    • Richard says:

      thats why they named it Hubble its close to Trouble

      NASA – What always happened was called “Ballooning”.

      In Simple words, At high temperatures (2,760 °C) , the metal parts of the casing bent away from each other, opening a gap through which hot gases—above 2,760 °C leaked

    • D. Boss says:

      And the same set of geniuses who forgot the fundamental kinetic energy calculation of 1/2mv^2 with a chunk of foam weighing over a kg broke off Columbia and slammed into the wing root at ~650 MPH…. which they caught on camera during lift off.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySiyzJEi01M

      After the catastrophe the investigators had a hard time getting an actual wing root section to test (because nobody believed the foam could have done the damage), but the above video of that test is conclusive.

      This average joe concluded the foam penetrated the wing from 1/2mv^2 even before Columbia broke up….

      1/2 x 1kg x (291m/s)^2 = 42,341 Joules for the foam block. a 50 caliber bullet has a ballistic or kinetic energy of 18,000 to 20,000 Joules! And a 50 cal bullet will penetrate a cast iron engine block of a car or truck!

      The idiots at NASA surmised the low density of the foam rendered it ineffective – but it’s not density stupid, it’s mass times velocity squared!

      (and Billyjack – it was not a $20 O-ring for Challenger, it is 0.28 inches in cross section and 37 feet in diameter and there are a pair of them at each solid rocket joint – they are thousands of dollars each – but no matter they get stiff when cold and thus do not seal as NASA was warned by engineers for the boosters) (AND NASA was using SELECTIVE data analysis to make go-no go decision on booster seal failure as in this link:

      https://priceonomics.com/the-space-shuttle-challenger-explosion-and-the-o/

      So the frackers were fudging numbers in the 1980’s which cost lives – how many lives and livelihoods will be destroyed from their selective data, or outright “adjusted” data on climate now?)

  2. Richard says:

    The Burlington VT, Climate Action Plan reports the entire city’s carbon dioxide emissions for 2007—from all sources—at 397,272.4 tons. Yet the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency calculates the CO2 emissions of McNeil’s Generating Station alone—the 50 megawatt biomass incinerator supplying roughly one-third of the city’s electricity—at 444,646 tons per year. A closer look reveals that the city only counted 2% of McNeil’s emissions from the 30 cords of wood it burns per hour
    (Firewood available per acre = 10 x .81 cords = 8.1 cords per acre APPROX 3 acres per hour of timber) from New York and Vermont forests along with a varying percentage of natural gas (including fracked gas).
    One million Btu’s is the heat equivalent of approximately 7 gallons of No. 2 heating oil or kerosene, 293 kWh of electricity, 976 cubic feet of natural gas, 11 gallons of propane, 125 pounds of air-dried wood, 121 pounds of pellets, or 71 pounds of coal.

    Wood puts out more CO2 than coal and reduces the trees that consume CO2

  3. Linda Quackenbush says:

    Bravo…One of the best articulated videos on how US Gov’t has once again altered science in the name achieving a Globalist Agenda to fundamentally change truth! CV19 mass hysteria was by design to keep world’s masses under globalist control! While we are quarantining the globalists of the world are laughing all the way to the bank! Make no mistake Beijing Biden’s objective is to complete the job of Manchurian Obama who sold our ICANN-IANA IPs to UN-WEF-EU-CCP’s Belt Road Initiative for TPP-NAFTA-New World Order-Agenda 21! America will become a Serfdom if we continue to let FEAR control us! Its time to rise up and let our voices be heard!!

    • Richard says:

      Problem is Linda- too many want to listen to the , Taking Heads, LEFTIES and THE World is going to end in 12 years- for 50 Years or since First Earth day we have had dire predictions EVERY Year like 20-30 per year- after Katrina Hurricane – EVERY Year since 2005 we have heard MORE HURRICANES predicated to hit land this year

      the Masses live in a Cocoon & 90% of US citizens cannot find Iran on a map

  4. Thomas Fowler says:

    The graph shown at the beginning is basically identical to one that I drew myself using independent sources for the CO2 and the temperature. If you look closely, you’ll see that the temperature increase always starts BEFORE the CO2 increase–exactly the opposite of the global warming theories, as Tony discusses. I use this in my classes at GMU when I discuss the climate change dispute as an example of the interaction of technology and society. I try to make the students realize that they have to look very closely at graphs the are present to push some ideological agenda.

    • D. Boss says:

      Thomas Fowler teaches students to use some critical thinking when presented with Climate Cult Propaganda… Excellent work!

      You may want to consider showing them this lecture by Patrick Moore, one of the founders of Greenpeace, who left them in the 90’s due to their veering away from science and towards a marxist, anti-human agenda:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0Z5FdwWw_c&t=866s

      2015 Annual GWPF Lecture – Patrick Moore – Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?

      Moore makes a very compelling case against the alarmism, and indeed points out CO2 is the “stuff of life” the “staff of life” and that earth’s ecosystem was headed for complete extinction over the last several million years due to sequestration of CO2 into ocean sediments by shell making of small organisms – and in the last ice age, we approached the death of all life threshold of 150 ppm, when it reached 180 ppm.

      His thesis has not been challenged and indeed says humans adding CO2 back into the atmosphere is actually staving off complete extinction of all life (if plants die below 150 ppm, the entire food chain also dies, as do the O2 levels)

      He even goes further and says after we burn all the fossil fuels, we should then use solar and nuclear energy to burn limestone, releasing even more CO2…. to help re-balance the CO2 levels, which plants prefer to be at 1,000 to perhaps 1,500 ppm!

  5. TOTO is 13!!!!
    My Favorite Number
    Worked for Original Colonies

  6. John Donnelly says:

    This is a question I got from a denial denier. I certainly can’t vouch for the instigator

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2021/02/25/atlantic-ocean-currents-weakening-amoc-gulf-stream/

  7. Agen Slot says:

    of course like your website however you have to check the spelling on several of your posts.
    A number of them are rife with spelling problems and I
    in finding it very bothersome to tell the reality however I’ll definitely come
    back again.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *