Science Requires Actual Thinking

In 2009, NASA claimed that East Antarctica was losing ice.

NASA satellites detect unexpected ice loss in East Antarctica — ScienceDaily

I explained a few months later what they were doing wrong.

Amazing Grace – Watts Up With That?

And a few months later even TIME Magazine acknowledged the error.

Climate Change: New Study Halves the Rate of Ice Cap Melt |

In 2015 NASA’s Jay Zwally acknowledged the obvious – that East Antarctica was not losing ice.

NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses | NASA

And now, NASA is back claiming the same nonsense.

Video: Antarctic Ice Mass Loss 2002-2020 – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

In 1984, NASA’s James Hansen predicted 4C global warming and 5-8C warming in Antarctica.

Wayback Machine

Meanwhile, Antarctica probably just had their coldest winter on record.

The South Pole just had its most severe cold season on record – The Washington Post

Hansen’s warming estimates were off by a factor of ten.

Climate Reanalyzer

By 1906, Antarctic sea ice had retreated thirty miles – during NASA’s coldest years on record.

31 Jul 1906 – South Pole Warming Up

graph.png (1130×600)

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Science Requires Actual Thinking

  1. Bob Hoye says:

    Detailed expose.
    The question is about how to get the evidence to the brainwashed public?

  2. GWS says:

    It always comes down to interpreting the data (What in the heck do our measurements say?), then telling the truth.

    • rah says:

      Science requires integrity and NOAA and NASA have none. If you aren’t objective enough to admit that your wrong and cook the numbers to try and make it seem your correct then your not a scientist doing science, your something else doing something else.

      • arn says:

        Well,everything requires a certain integrity,otherwise it’ll be corrupted and turj to shit-just like everything the woke touch.
        And that’s why integrity is being systematically destroyed(be it education,medicine,culture,religion)
        and replaced by fear and loyalty to big brother – to create the new man(eternal minion) the commie desires

      • Vegieman says:

        “your something else doing something else”

        Say it like it is: you’re a liar deceiving the people.

  3. Mikey0 says:

    The one loss that we can all see and agree on is the loss of credibility of NASA and climate alarmists in general. There are NO facts to back up ANY claims. NASA fudging the data just exposes their lack of integrity. Blinded by non-science?

  4. Robert Rust says:

    By its own description of its objective and purpose, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC, an obvious politically-motivated organization (all government bodies are and can only be, to save their own skin), only and solely seeks data and information that supports global warming and that the warming is due to human causes, its evidence chiefly based on misinterpreted Antarctic meteorological and geological ice-core data on atmospheric CO2 that in reality is more evidence proving Earth’s regular crustal displacement behaviour that underlies all the regularly patterned ice core, ocean level, and related geological, meteorological, and biological changes on Earth’s surface. So, naturally, IPCC doesn’t concern itself much with or care about information that disagrees with or doesn’t support its clearly stated agenda. It has all that it wants and needs, specious evidence that allows itself and its fellow world cartel members (industry, banking, corps, media, mainstream education, entertainment, etc) to stay in power and control. Voting is always about chasing opinions and stroking egos, never about getting down to the overall, revealing truth (that government leadership, not to mention Mod Civ, is a fraud and crime against humanity). If the panel could get away with it, and it certainly is trying, it would use as evidence for vastly increased, life-threatening global warming the fact that autumn becomes increasingly cooler as the year progresses from summer into winter, purposefully and conveniently ignoring seasonal cycles on Earth.

    • arn says:

      The IPCC would be rendered useless(and its global agenda destroyed) if evidence would proof no global warming,
      And any parasitic institution will do anything to stay alive(the law of survival is even part of institutions and corporations).

      So far we live in an era where the existence of the IPCC is absolutely irrellevant
      as the numbers of humans that are being killed as result of climate extremes went down by 90%.
      No more million victims after floods and famines,no more tens of thousands of heat wave victims,dispite the fact that the world population doubled/trippled since the last huge climate desasters.
      And the real evil cynism is,
      that they misuse the best of all climate times to bring a commie system that has killed more people in the last century than all the climate related catastrophies.

  5. Gamecock says:

    Meanwhile, sea level rise plods along at the same rate it has for a hundred years.

    NASA: if you are going to claim increased melt rate, you better have increased sea level rise, or else your whole game is OVER. If increased melting results in no change in sea level, there is NO REASON FOR ANYONE TO CARE.

  6. Tony. When an “E” code is attached to a USHCN temperature value it means “Estimated”. But what does the “EX” code mean?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *