“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness”
– Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Erasing Thermometer Data
- Hiding The Decline
- Global Boiling Christmas
- Fake Data At Altus, Oklahoma
- Worse Than The Dust Bowl
- 777 Imaginary Thermometers
- Extraordinary Claims
- Nebraska’s Hottest Day
- Kerry Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- OSI Vs. NSIDC
- 777 Fake Stations
- The End Of Snow In Wales
- The End Of Snow
- “Experts Say”
- “Deniers going crazy”
- ““verging on climate denial”, scientists said”
- Global Warming Makes It Cold
- Global Sea Ice Area
- Canada
- “we’ve lost control”
- “we’ve lost control”
- National Climate Assessment Math
- Net Zero Progress
- London Cancels Hanukkah
- Denying Scientific Principles (Part 2)
Recent Comments
- jb on Erasing Thermometer Data
- jb on Erasing Thermometer Data
- Richard E Fritz on Canada
- Richard E Fritz on Global Warming Makes It Cold
- Richard E Fritz on ““verging on climate denial”, scientists said”
- Richard E Fritz on ““verging on climate denial”, scientists said”
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Snow In Wales
- Bob G on Kerry Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- rah on Global Boiling Christmas
- conrad ziefle on Worse Than The Dust Bowl