Greenland Melting At -65F

15 Responses to Greenland Melting At -65F

1. Frank says:

   January 19, 2023 at 4:23 am

   https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NjlC02NsIt0&feature=youtu.be

   IS GLOBAL WARMING THE BIGGEST FRAUD IN HISTORY? – Dan Pena

   Salty language warning

   Reply
   • Jeff L. says:

     January 19, 2023 at 4:25 pm

     Excellent video! Too bad he confused the age of the Earth (~4.5BY) with the age of the universe (~13.8BY).

     Reply
   • Frank says:

     January 19, 2023 at 4:26 pm

     https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Farticles%2F2023%2F01%2Fipcc_climate_models_grossly_exaggerate_global_warming.html

     Reply
     • Disillusioned says:

       January 20, 2023 at 1:49 am

       “Radiation forcing calculations by both skeptics and believers show that carbon dioxide radiation forcing is about 0.3 percent of the incident radiation, far less than other effects on climate. Over a period of human civilization, the temperature has oscillated between quite a few warm and cold periods, with many of the warm periods being warmer than today. During geological times, it and the carbon dioxide level have been all over the place with no correlation between them.”

       Bingo. In modern times, the Agenda for global totalitarianism replaced the scientific method with bought-and-paid-for pal review data creation – and voilà, we have unprecedented correlation. That’s a word they love to throw around – unprecedented. 🙄

       Reply
       • Gordon Vigurs says:

         January 20, 2023 at 4:27 pm

         I hate to break it to you, but ‘radiation forcing calculations’ really aren’t worth the paper they are written on.

         Reply
         • Disillusioned says:

           January 21, 2023 at 4:41 pm

           Thanks Gordon. I respect your knowledge on the topic. I became a skeptic when I learned the radiative forcing capability of CO2 is so minuscule that the majority is spent before 100 ppm. It wouldn’t surprise me if it were less than that. Either way I think that means they chose the wrong gas to scapegoat for a ‘climate crisis’.

           I was probably wrong in agreeing with Corsi about no correlation, also. Because there does seem to be a correlation – that CO2 follows temperature, not the other way around. I think Mother Nature has proven Arrhenius to be wrong.
         • conrad ziefle says:

           January 21, 2023 at 6:00 pm

           I’ve also heard that lower levels had already exhausted the waves lengths that CO2 captures, but haven’t seen any calculations in that regard. Somewhere I think I’ve seen some counter to that, it being that more CO2 impacts the reradiation of those wave lengths higher up into the atmosphere. Current levels of CO2 are way lower than any data I have seen regarding its radiation effect. You have to extrapolate downward to determine what you think the effect should be. I still believe that those atmospheric rivers, High Priest Gore was screeching about, are the results of huge amounts of heat being radiated by H2O vapor to space, i.e. the water cycle is THE major regulator of Earth’s temperature, and it is darn near impossible to damage its effect. It seems odd, given Gore’s argument, that the atmospheric river is coming at the coldest part of the year, not the hottest, and is bracketed by colder than normal weather before and after. We are currently having colder than normal weather in Northern California, now that the atmospheric river seems to have ended. I also still wonder if it was the Little Ice Age that paused, not Global Warming. I.e. the Little Ice Age may have been the little forerunner to the big one.
   • Richard says:

     January 19, 2023 at 7:44 pm

     Y2K was in 20th
     ISO-9001 and go along standards are still in the lead over GW at $2 trillion the ISO Scam is probably close

     Reply
2. Eli Pit Bull says:

   January 19, 2023 at 8:55 am

   Absolute unhinged lunatic
   Presenting Algore
   https://twitter.com/redvoicenews/status/1615808847544999941?s=61&t=AQDQv1ZQBQpAGLURft2EHA

   Reply
   • conrad ziefle says:

     January 21, 2023 at 6:01 pm

     Maybe he is Igor, the one in Young Frankenstein.

     Reply
3. rah says:

   January 19, 2023 at 8:57 am

   Summit station was showing -45 at the time I posted this.

   Reply
4. arn says:

   January 19, 2023 at 9:26 am

   But they told me that global warming means more snow (from the past).
   This should result in a growing ice sheet – shouldn’t it.

   Reply
   • MGJ says:

     January 19, 2023 at 1:24 pm

     Under political tyranny, the Law is whatever somebody in power says it is. Likewise under $cience, the facts are whatever somebody says they are. Anyone who points out contradiction or paradox is dismissed – by (circular) definition – as not understanding the $cience.

     Reply
5. John Anthony says:

   January 20, 2023 at 2:04 am

   This idiot has no credibility ,and should be mocked mercilessly!

   Reply
6. Petit_Barde says:

   January 20, 2023 at 7:23 am

   I heard that this clown came unglued to Davos :
   – did anyone see him get up from his chair?

   Reply