There is no such thing as a “global surface temperature” measurement, due to very poor coverage.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
Recent Comments
- JohnFrancis on Climate Scamming For Profit
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- GW on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Mac on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
How long before that twitter post and the article are scrubbed
They just proved what climate ‘deniers’ have been telling everyone for years
The lie their asses off. It is what they’ve been doing all along. They change color schemes of color pictures of coral to make it looked bleached out. They take pictures of water cooling towers spewing steam at coal fired power plants and use techniques to make the white steam look dark and dirty.
The drone Attenborough’s team used to film spooked walruses so badly it drove the beasts off a cliff to their deaths but when the scenes were presented on the BBC it was claimed climate change caused it.
The lies and deceptions are never ending. And yet where the rubber meets the road, and people are asked what they are most concerned about, Climate Change always comes out at the bottom of the list, if it even makes the list.
Have another look at the ‘falling walruses’ scam, rah. You will find that the walruses were choosing falling off a cliff over being attacked by a dirty-great polar bear behind them which was out-of-shot.
I think both explanations are viable.
Blaming global warming for polar bears eating walruses, however, is a bit of a stretch.
How does a lack of weather stations make it hard to warn people? Is a weather station a communication device? About future events? Someone from Yale said this?
Anywho, thanks to satellites, we have some temperature data for Africa.
Looking closely at the maps, the ‘hottest’ areas are those that have no measuring devices and the temperature is estimated by a computer program. It is not difficult to create a ‘hottest ever’ scenario if you are able to estimate temperatures.
An obvious fraud has been committed by Yale Environment 360 – can anybody else spot it?
So-called “weather stations” (as referred to in the text of the tweet) do not equal “weather radar stations” as shown in the accompanying map.