NASA claims July 22 was earth’s hottest day on record. In this video I look at the junk science behind this idiotic propaganda.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- spren on HUD Climate Advisor
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Tel on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Petit_Barde on Ellen Flees To The UK
- dm on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
Seems NASA has already reached full DEI inclusivity and net-zero-postmodernism.
From being able to fly to the moon to be too incompetent to read simple data in
50 years.
One may get the idea that humans are not descended from monkeys
but monkeys descended from human experts who went woke.
The big problem with lies is maintaining consistency. In the UK the MET Office claim record high ocean temperature, which begs the question of whether the increased CO2 levels might be due to out gassing from the oceans, rather than the use of affordable energy. Cherry picking reference dates is just one of many propaganda ploys. I imagine that once the absurdity of the global warming scare becomes apparent to even the stupidest, the prophets (or should it be profits) of doom will revert to the imminent ice age scare, using 1934 as the reference year. Of course, the cause will still be human economic activity.
How can you criticize NASA? Well just ask the crew members stranded on the space station because NASA let a flawed space capsule fly… Or the astronauts lost in the Challenger and Columbia disasters… or even the 3 lost in the Apollo 1 fire.
Apollo 13 sure was not their finest hour either (that the astronauts made it back is remarkable, but the explosion should never have happened in the first place).
So even without the blatant data manipulation which produced this narrative, they certainly can be wrong, flawed, and deadly in their track record. The data manipulation though, is a next level fraud and not a mere misstep or bad decision – it is deliberately misleading and criminal, as in crime against humanity.
You can criticize NASA the same was you can criticize the once mighty Boeing after it deliberately produced the 737MAX crashes and the door plug falling off. Oh wait wasn’t it Boeing who made the flawed capsule stuck on the space station?
I live just outside one of the midwest’s largest cities, and the weather forecasters on TV are now admitting that it seems unlikely that we will make it to 90 degrees in July, nowhere in the surrounding hundreds of square miles, for the first time since 2000. Not even the massive heat island effect of this huge area, paved over with blacktop, with old-fashioned black tar roofs everywhere, can get the temps above the 80’s.
Given that hottest day ever means <.01F, which is usually the case, then it would be necessary that all regions of the global have at least higher than average temperatures for on that day. If any large regions are below average, then the hot regions have to be extremely higher than average. You should be seeing a large number, probably larger than ever before, of highest local temperatures ever. If you're not seeing those and some are even below average, then it cannot be the hottest day ever (recorded).
Global SST data shows 0.5°C warming since 1940. Lets panic!
https://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadsst3gl/from:1940
I doubt that is even right and if it is, there is nothing to say that it is a trend. When you look at the ice core data you will see periods of time that are 1000 years long where the temperature goes opposite of its longer term trend. The reason why I doubt this information is right, isn’t because it isn’t possible, but because it is the exact thing they want. If they were to point out something that disagrees with their dogma, then I’ll start believing them.