Texas temperatures peaked between 1900 and 1930, but NOAA tampers with the data to turn a long term cooling trend into a warming trend. Two thirds of the data they use in their “final adjusted” dataset is now fake.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
- Useful Graphs From ChatGPT
- Fort Lauderdale Drowning
- Sinking Of The Titanic
- Expert Arctic Forecasting
- Sinking Of The Titanic
- Nobel Prize Winning Forecast
- Changing Climate
- Gen Z Math And Solutions
- Orwellian NASA Maps
- Faking US Temperature Data
Recent Comments
- oeman50 on Adult Content On X
- arn on Adult Content On X
- Bob G on Adult Content On X
- John B on Adult Content On X
- Bob G on Adult Content On X
- Bob G on Adult Content On X
- arn on Adult Content On X
- conrad ziefle on Adult Content On X
- conrad ziefle on Adult Content On X
- James on Faking US Temperature Data
Tony, you’re on a roll! 😀
if Trump wins, and that’s no lock with all the potential for cheating, he needs to clean house… just like Elon Musk did with Twitter. send the fraudsters packing. They can always learn to code
DEVASTATING COMBINATION: Tony’s data tampering insights & https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/08/18/the-quest-for-climates-golden-fleece/
Scan down to the paragraph just above Fig. 10. Atmospheric CO2’s apparent effect on global temperatures implies a climate sensitivity of 1.25 degrees as the concentration doubles from 280 ppm to 560 ppm. In contrast, almost half of the climate models shown on Fig. 8 assume climate sensitivities EXCEEDING 4.5 degrees.
Not only is 4.5+ degrees a multiple of lived experience, 4.5+ degrees exceeds the hot end of the range of climate sensitivity estimates shown in Fig. 7.
The nail in the coffin is: The inferred 1.25 degree sensitivity almost certainly OVERSTATES the actual. First, it assumes, presumably for simplicity’s sake, that rising atmospheric CO2 caused all the global temperature change since 1976. Second, as Tony has shown, data tampering caused much of the increase in adjusted temperature series since 1976. If one removes the tampering, the inferred sensitivity is LESS than 1.0 degree–and that reflects ALL feedbacks.
I think that what you say is in line with what all real, not-government-controlled, intelligent scientists say.