“Carbon pollution directly results in asthma, heart disease, and cancer,” said Dr. Steve Auerbach, a New York pediatrician who also marched in his lab coat.
400,000 Converge on Manhattan to Demand Climate Change Action | TIME
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on NASA Sea Level
- Lasse on NASA Sea Level
- Scott Allen on “getting smaller”
- Greg in NZ on NASA Sea Level
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Gordon Vigurs on “fair & equitable”
- Gordon Vigurs on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Gordon Vigurs on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Bob G on “getting smaller”
- arn on “getting smaller”
We are witnessing the effectiveness of the propaganda artist that really:
1. Won WWII in late August 1945
2. Formed the UN on 24 Oct 1945
In order to expand his totalitarian rule of the USSR globally:
http://orach24463.wordpress.com/2014/09/21/the-peoples-climate-march-is-not-about-saving-the-planet-it-is-about-power-to-the-elite-not-the-people/
Hmm. Where did that, um, person graduate from and how did he pass his Boards? /sarc
He bought his degree from Greepeace. They sell them to raise money.
That is an amazingly stupid quote.
I think the doctor is correct. There is a 100% chance that every victim of asthma, heart disease and cancer has inhaled atmospheric carbon (dioxide). Also, water, molecular oxygen and molecular nitrogen among a few other compounds. Carbon dioxide contains oxygen, so is it carbon pollution or oxygen pollution causing these diseases. I guarantee that if these pollutants are removed from the atmosphere, the incidences of these diseases will dramatically decrease.
So will those that suffer from them…
Life is lethal
I’ve always heard “Life is a terminal illness”.
No one gets out alive.
I’ve always heard “Life is a terminal illness”.
And is sexually transmitted.
Clearly we must ban sex.
The EPA will have to declare Oxygen a pollutant. Then it can be taxed; regulated; sequestered; and have O2 contracts traded.
Assholes, all.
Finished last in his class in Grenada.
LOL ( and maybe true, good grief! )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk
A great quote from a film full of great quotes.
He said carbon, not carbon dioxide. Somebody is spreading carbon all around.
The fact the ‘Doctor’ is either:
1. Talking about fine particle carbon/soot that causes lung disease and linking that solid to the gas in the air
OR
2. Is using the word carbon to mean the molecule CO2
Shows he is no scientist and can’t even think logically so should have his license to practice medicine revoked.
Carbon causes cancer. The tar in cigarettes causes cancer, the soot on skin caused chimney sweeps to get cancer, so this idiot is correct, because he says carbon instead of CO2.
remember the assholes name,and never let him treat any of your kids if they end up in hospital.what a fool.
I should stop to breath
He forgot the heartache of psoriasis.
Earth salvation would come if all the idiots proclaiming CO2 a pollution would stop exhaling…
There is a difference between carbon particulates and CO2, but of course this climate change protestor purposely conflated the two.
Does he know the health consequences of drinking water contaminated by the heavy metals in run-off from tailings from lithium and rare earths mining (i.e. elements used in green energy tech)?
I have to take my leave of this, I can stand only so much stupidity.
(as in that of the doctor) fresh air, social interchange, most of all the grand kids are the cure!
I went to the climate rally Sat. In Santa fe Nm. A guy actually told me there was no cancer until the industrial revolution. Blaming cancer on a nonpollutant
Most people died of Smallpox before they got old enough to get cancer
There was no cancer because cancer is a disease of old age (mostly) The life expectancy before 1900 was ~35 years (or less). Most of the unhealthy individuals therefore had died off long before cancer could set in.
He need to Google this: “cancer in ancient man” and the first link he will get is this: http://discovermagazine.com/2013/julyaug/16-history-cancer-afflicted-people-since-prehistoric-times-fossils-show Typical greenie dumber than a moron and lazy to-boot.
There was cancer. Children died and die from it. What there was not was a correct diagnosis. That required more modern tools that the Industrial revolution helped to bring about.
So the idiot really meant that there was no cancer diagnosis before then. But what he said was like saying there was no oxygen before it was discovered to be a component of air – just Aether.
He was wrong. I read 18th century medical books for fun, and there was tons of cancer in those days.
I read further, it looks like Gail is right, we have more cancer because most of us live longer, It also look also like the rate of bone cancer which affect young people has not change much.
We have more cancer because people don’t die of smallpox anymore, or yellow fever, scarlet fever, flu, plague, tuberculosis…..
Sort of…there are a number of cancers, that as a percentage are actually LOWER now, but the number of those who suffer from it is higher. One that I can think of is prostate cancer. So, it’s really a multiple factor reason, with the larger population that lives longer being the primary reason.