We are now CO2². My beautiful and talented wife Kirye is a new member of the CO2 Coalition.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- arn on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- Bob G on CO2²
- Bob G on CO2²
- conrad ziefle on CO2²
- arn on CO2²
I would like to apply to be the seventh member of the board…. the CO2 board. Admittedly my resume is a bit weak, barely graduating high school, but over the years I’ve earned a good living being a BSing salesman. the skill I would bring to the board is an ability to recognize “experts” that are BSers, as I am. I smelled a rat decades ago, on the man-made climate change hoax. our local temperature records go back 140 years and they did not match the propaganda from the climatenestas. a trace gas does not control the climate, and in this case the trace gas is an essential trace gas. oh…I just checked the 10-day forecast we can barely break 80 in South Central Minnesota. where’s the crisis? I’m expecting a record crop yield as we’ve been getting ample rain every couple days. as Rush Limbaugh always said…. follow the money.
Once the day will come when we all realise that Co2 is just a projection.
A projection of the 0.01% that
0.01% of a climate gas can wield as much power inside the atmosphere as they do inside the global markets and global politics.
And if mankind really gives in to the 0.01% of the 0.01%
than it deserves what it gets.
The CO2 Coalition’s position is that the greenhouse effect due to CO2 is small because CO2 is already doing its worst. This is countered by the alarmists by showing that greenhouse gas concentration increases the radiative height, and although the net input irradiance remains the same, the surface temperature increases.
The fact is the greenhouse effect is thermodynamic nonsense requiring spontaneous creation of energy, it is a matter of folklore initiated by the likes of Carl Sagan, perhaps the finest salesman of the scientific community. Greenhouses do not work by the greenhouse effect, and neither does the atmosphere. The temperature distribution arises from the circulation of atmospheric gases which occurs because packets of gas are unstable under bouyancy forces and must circulate. By the First Law, the increase in gravitational potential energy of the circulating gases, as they rise, results in a reduction in thermal energy (the enthalpy) of the gas. End of story. The radiative properties of the gases are irrelevant to either the temperature distribution or surface temperature. The greenhouse effect is little more than an obstruction to progress in meteorology, planetary science and geology, the sooner it is consigned to its rightful place in the dustbin of ideas, along with phlogiston, the geocentric universe, the flat Earth, canals on Mars and Piltdown Man, the better.
The question is.
Why doesn’t 95% co2 on Mars increase radiative height or temperatures at all?
And why did it fail to do so on earth at 7000 ppm+ levels.
For some reason there seems to be no saturation effect in terms of co2 “warming”.
It scales endlessly upwards in terms of temperature.
But even then,
and if we use the highest estimates.
15 degrees warmer during 7000 ppm cambrian era(let’s ignore that we got similar temperatures with significantly less co2 )
every 100ppm increase would result in a 0.22 degree in temperature –
which is absolutely irrellevant and barely measurable.
Quite. The greenhouse conjecture (it is not a hypothesis, let alone a ‘theory’), has neither empirical nor theoretical basis. It is no better than astrology.
Thank you Gordon. I was just about to say that. ?. 🙂
This post on the CO2 Coalition is the best news I have had in years! I hope the Coalition acts persistently and swiftly to give the lie to the iniquitous Global Warming hoax. The hoax has led to the upward transfer of wealth from the ordinary people to the elite, the self-styled Anointed, as Thomas Sowell calls them, leading to a reduction in the standard of living and potential reversion to a more primitive way of life.
If you look at co2 as an accounting problem, you’ll see that all is not right with the “delicate balance” meme . Production of co2 can be viewed as income, and sinks, atmospheric increases, and mystery disappearance as expenses, checking and assets. You do something with your total income, it’s not magic. It’s the same with co2. Percentage basis is very useful in detecting where your money is going ( fraud). So, 42% ends up in the atmosphere, 50% is supposedly sunk in the oceans and land…. but where is the other 8%???? The first 20 years of this century, nearly all of the increased co2 production, 114 billion tons, is outside of the atmospheric increase and being sunk.
In other news, where oh where could we possibly look at the earth in the 1960’s to get a full coverage of emissivity of the earth? While I certainly agree that coverage was not complete for the GHNC ( mostly made up ) that is not the case for the 290 K or 17 C. I know we could go to the moon and look back at earth!!! Gosh, I wonder if they did that ta ta da.. Batman!! What year did mankind, pronouns please, I might offend someone, he, she, it… take a walk on the moon??? Unless you don’t believe we did that. These days we can’t get a rocket off the ground. With the hand ringing, ghoulish Alarmism rise of 1.5 C since 1979, we are still 0.5 C below 55 years ago.
I do not know about those numbers,
but how is it even remotely possible that more of the man made co2
gets absorbed by oceans than by the atmosphere?
The atmospheric absorbtion is almost instant(it’s actually an injection directly into the system),
while the oceanic absorbtion is a very slow process.
One is gas within a gas,
the other is gas within a liquid that has a 500 * higher density.
On top of that the Oceanic absorbtion happens 2 Dimensional as it happens on the surface and the co2 release happens mostly on land.
Bookmarked it, and will look into becoming a member. Very prestigious group of scientists on a great mission.
I advise that everyone go to their website and take the quiz. I got 100% because of the education I got at this website.
Looks like the big Putin Trump summit…. concerning Ukraine, will be held tomorrow at or near Anchorage Alaska. expected high temperature tomorrow in Anchorage, AK, even with 16 hours of sunlight, is a cool 61°. I don’t think the subject of global warming will be coming up tomorrow.