http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20110306/climate-change-impact-110306/
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- France And England To Defeat Russia
- COP29 Update
- Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- “Gender-responsive climate action”
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on France And England To Defeat Russia
- Petit_Barde on France And England To Defeat Russia
- spren on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- spren on France And England To Defeat Russia
- Bill on France And England To Defeat Russia
- Mike Peinsipp on France And England To Defeat Russia
- Francis Barnett on COP29 Update
- Jack the Insider on COP29 Update
- Bill on HUD Climate Advisor
- arn on France And England To Defeat Russia
Obviously their ecological models suck just as much as their climate models.
Isn’t it just amazing that everything, every aspect, every detail, every effect on humans and the animals and the plants by a little bit of warming are ALL BAD? It beggars the imagination.
Of course, the claims are all from fertile, paranoid, mostly low integrity and/low low functioning minds.
Ever wonder why so many people retire to Florida? Because it cold?
That is one of my biggest beefs with the CAGW hoax. If the Earth was warming up the effects should be fairly equally distributed between benign, beneficial, and malevolent, but all we hear is that it would be univesrsally catastrophic.
Anyway you can’t even parody the CAGW claims. World to end. Women, minorities, and the poor hardest hit.
CO2 is a rich, racist, chauvinistic, right-wing molecule. So, when you get more of them, the results are predictable.
Charles Higley says:
March 7, 2011 at 2:53 am
Of course, the claims are all from fertile, paranoid, mostly low integrity and/low low functioning minds.
It’s easier to boil all evil down to one thing. You don’t have to actually take the time and sort everything out. It’s kinda like how some people boil Middle East relations down to one word, Halliburton. It’s all easy to figure out then like a corny political George Clooney movie.
I think you meant to say ‘febrile.’
Climate change impacts those least responsible….
Oh how true. But if only they would tell the real story, the real impacts, that those least responsible are dying of starvation from biofuel programs.
@Amino Acids in Meteorites says:
March 7, 2011 at 3:12 am
In one, good comment.
“World to end tomorrow — women, children, minorities, poor and GLBT to suffer the most”
HIV was said to be the first virus with civil rights. I guess CO2 must be the first molecule guilty of hate crimes.
If you are rich and/or successful, you are evil and should be guilt ridden. How dare you enjoy life more than the “most vulnerable” of the world (anyone other than a straight white male)!