“In supporting documents, the authors admit that the data used was of very low quality. This study is really an exercise in selective data and manipulated methodologies used to reach conclusions that deliberately contradict mainstream science,” Jones said.
Howarth, however, defended his work as meeting strict academic and scientific standards. “It’s being published in a highly respected journal and has been rigorously peer-reviewed,” a report from Reuters quoted Howarth as saying. “This is not advocacy. This is science.”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Richard E Fritz on HUD Climate Advisor
- Richard E Fritz on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Bob G on Ellen Flees To The UK
Nothing to see here, the Lead author of the CARB Diesel Study got his degree out of a Cracker Jacks box and it’s great research.
http://articles.ocregister.com/2009-12-03/opinion/24655247_1_carb-diesel-soot The scientist with a real degree that dimed him out gets fired from UCLA http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/08/31/pc-professors-firing-fueling-exhaustive-debate/.
It’s par for the Climate Warming course.
This was a break in the usual peer reviewed love fest among climate scientists. Some one must have injected truth serum!
I thought at first Phil Jones was giving us an honest opinion of his own work.
What is the point of this post? There is nothing about peer-review in the actual article.
Err, what’s this then?…… “Howarth, however, defended his work as meeting strict academic and scientific standards. “It’s being published in a highly respected journal and has been rigorously peer-reviewed,” a report from Reuters quoted Howarth as saying.”
I think Howarth’s comment might give you a slight clue.
Howarth, however, defended his work as meeting strict academic and scientific standards. “It’s being published in a highly respected journal and has been rigorously peer-reviewed,”
lol, I need to remember to refresh before posting…..
lol, Steve, the story is even more in showing that peer-review is entirely crap!!!!
Ingraffea:(One of the authors of the study) “We do not intend for you to accept what we have reported on today as the definitive scientific study in respect to this question, clearly it is not……”
Ingraffea: “I hope you don’t gather from this presentation that we think we’re right.”
Howarth:(the other author) “A lot of the data we used are really low quality, but…”
There’s a lot more golly gee-whiz stuff to dissect, but if this doesn’t show everybody what the peer-review process is, nothing will.
lmao!!!! And it got published.
http://www.energyindepth.org/2011/04/five-things-to-know-about-the-cornell-shale-study/
Here’s the video of their quotes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHg6Ueb2t-E&feature=player_embedded
hahaahahahahaha!!!!