Climate scientists are sure that they understand the climate, except for every couple of weeks when they admit that they underestimated the effects of aerosols, solar cycles, Methane, Ozone, clouds, soot, jet contrails, cow farts, ocean currents, ocean salinity ……..
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ice-Free Arctic Warning
- No One Is Above The Law!
- Securing Reproductive Rights
- Endless Summer At The New York Times
- “baseless claim”
- “Scientists Tell Us”
- Assessing Climate Risk
- Thanksgiving Greeting From Dr. Fauci
- Follow Liz To Canada
- Climate Deal Reached
- “Siberia will become the greatest farming country in the world”
- New York To Flee The US For Canada
- 50% EV Sales By 2030
- Ivy League Clown Show
- Biden’s Existential Threat
- Massachusetts Saving The Planet
- France And England To Defeat Russia
- COP29 Update
- Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- “Gender-responsive climate action”
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
Recent Comments
- Tommyb on Ice-Free Arctic Warning
- arn on Ice-Free Arctic Warning
- arn on Ice-Free Arctic Warning
- conrad ziefle on Securing Reproductive Rights
- conrad ziefle on Ice-Free Arctic Warning
- patrick healy on Securing Reproductive Rights
- William on Ice-Free Arctic Warning
- William on Ice-Free Arctic Warning
- arn on Ice-Free Arctic Warning
- Gamecock on Securing Reproductive Rights
LOL, I would have said 99.44%, but whatever.
-Scott
You’re just too young …..
You name it and they got it wrong! They do not even understand how a butterfly affects the global climate and there is one flapping its wings in West Africa as we speak.
The only thing alarmists know about flapping has to do with their gums.
When you have to preface every utterance with “climate change is real and caused by humans, it is occurring now, and it is dangerous for mankind” like some zombie mantra it begins to ring hollow pretty quickly.
That statement is a keeper; it would be impossible for any “climate scientist” to rebut it in a rational manner.