The graph below shows how misleading Muller’s data set is post 1980
Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs
Let’s lose the post-1980 hockey stick, and do a more meaningful merge. No net global warming for 75 years.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Greg in NZ on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- czechlist on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- arn on COP29 Preview
- arn on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
When all the feedback effects set in from nothing happening, nothing will happen. Just you wait!
Science and general historians will look back to this time and wonder, “How could they–the whole civilized world–take their ‘global temperature’ measurements so seriously, especially when they flew in the face of the well-confirmed Standard Atmosphere, with its stable surface temperature?”
Yeah but, Steve Mosher says SAT is golden, and BEST is best.
The first graph is actually very damaging if you believe alarmist/sceptic/alarmist/skeptic/alarmist Muller’s BEST data is accurate. It shows that the troposphere is warming much more slowly than the surface. As we all know from the climate experts, water vapor feedback will cause the troposphere to warm at a different rate than the surface. This key signature is proof of CACC.
The graph demonstrates that water vapor feedback is strongly negative.
🙂
Your splicing looks silly but that is what climate scientists do!
Your second diagram is exactly what they do with sea level data.
What do you expect from a guy who lies about being a skeptic?