Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- JohnFrancis on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- John Francis on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Stuart Hamish on Extreme Weather
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime
- arn on Analyzing Big City Crime
- Gordon Vigurs on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Gordon Vigurs on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- conrad ziefle on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- arn on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Robertvd on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
“while California has lost nearly 1 million jobs during the last decade, Texas has gained 1 million”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
California needs to take more action than canceling 32 entirely, which 23 does not. California really needs to go back 20 or more years and review all the regulations that have been implemented with a resulting loss of productivity.
I think California has been listening to the movie stars rather than real businessmen.
The entrepreneurs in dot com land are not real business people.
http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2002/fs087-02/
I thought this interesting and relevant to the “green” argument of jobs and where they go, and why!
Its becoming rather apparent, considering the resources this nation has but can’t harvest because of sheer regulatory weight, the green advocacy arm of this country desires America to be dependent on foreign entities for any energy source we can find and hates American exceptionalism. But, then most knew that already, I hope.
I knew people that worked at the Mt Pass site. A co-worker that held a mining claim had to shut down week end operations due to environmental regulations that became more costly than the mine produced.
funny thing is really big business wants governmental interference and green hurdles.
Since the mandates are so self selecting only the government and big business can cooperate in their implementation. AND they can go off shore to secure those green profits.
Trouble is, for the rest of us this means huge costs and the steady destruction of businesses that currently employ.
I’ve tried to find a recent post where this is relevant, and I’m not usually given to send people to another site, but I don’t think Steven will mind.
Dr. Spencer lays out a beautiful statement in regards to tomorrow’s decision!
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/11/01/spencer-on-global-warming-elitism-tomorrow%E2%80%99s-election-and-the-future/#comment-521043
It’s a must read!