Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
Recent Comments
- gordon vigurs on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on 100% Wind By 2030
- gordon vigurs on 100% Wind By 2030
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- dm on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
I have read about this gem before and it brings a smile to my face every time. There are some who do not take kindly to being shown the extent of the consensus.
More of the usual dirty play.
there’s lies. there’s damn lies. then there’s statistics.
Someone remind these fools that the “consensus” used to be that the Sun revolved around the Earth, and remind them of what Einstein said about it taking only one experiment to prove a million others wrong. Now *he* was worth listening to.
2500 alarmed scientists standing on the wall.
If one alarmed scientist……..
…………….
75 alarmed scientists standing on the wall.
..but but everyone in cancun agreed – “A significant result” Bwahahaha….
BAFFINBOY from the commend string:
“What percentage of these nations agreed that AGW represented a clear and present danger that must be addressed on an urgent basis? Was it 1%? No. Was it 5%? No. Was it 20%? No. Was it 50%? No. Was it 70%? No. Was it 95%? No. Was it 100%. Yes!!!! A significant result. No “massaging” of figures required.”
“There are two kinds of statistics, the kind you look up and the kind you make up.”
– Rex Stout
Figures don’t lie, but liars can figure!
You know………., advertising this stuff takes away much fun when you spring it on a warmista. Sigh, but I guess its good that they know sooner or later.
I always have to laugh when they bring out the number of “scientists” who contributed to the IPCC reports.
A multinational company called Evolve were trying to develop a windfarm up our way last year ( we saw them off fortunately). They openly bragged that 7 of their employees were among the IPCC contributors. I am quite sure they did not allow any commercial allegiances to affect their contributions.