Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
Recent Comments
- David M Kitting on UK Officially Sucks
- Terry Shipman on UK Officially Sucks
- Reid on UK Officially Sucks
- Billyjack on UK Officially Sucks
- arn on UK Officially Sucks
- Bob G on UK Officially Sucks
- Russell Cook on UK Officially Sucks
- Margaret Smith on UK Officially Sucks
- gordon vigurs on UK Officially Sucks
- arn on UK Officially Sucks
Environmental and other Socialist taxes and regulation force more + more economic activity away from Europe to emerging markets like China + India where far more CO2 is emitted.
But we still get the blame for importing from those countries!
And that’s about it, in a nutshell.
If every one quit spending we could send the developing countries back into poverty where the Environmental movement wants them. They are pnly Happy when they can show pictures of starving children in foreign countries to get others to give them money under the belief they will use it to help the poor. Look at all the money people send now for the “Starving” animals that is eaten up by “Administrative” Costs.
Why does your headline say; “EU Hoping For UK Economic Depression” and the article you link to as ‘evidence’ says nothing about hoping for economic depression?
Some of the readers are able to put two and two together. Obviously not all though.
Some people still mange to get 5.
The article does not say what you need it to say to support you claim – pure and simple.
It is obvious that many in the eco-loony brigade would be more than happy to see economic activity curtailed.
Indeed it does not take a genius to work out that this is exactly what is already happening as a result of their policies currently in place.
But the article does not mention the ‘eco-loony brigade’, it is all a straw man.