Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The End Of Snow
- 117 MPH Winds In Ireland
- The End Of “Climate Action”
- Data Made Simple – Weather History Part II
- New Arctic Climate Discovered
- Airport Runways Cause Bad Weather
- Flooding Of January 1862
- Moving To Detroit To Escape Global Warming
- Visitech.ai – Data Made Simple – Weather History
- First Tracks In The Snow
- UK Green Energy Record
- UN Is Upset
- “Fascist Salute”
- Record Warmth Of January 1906
- Heat Trapping Difficulties
- Visitech – Data Made Simple – Antarctic Sea Ice
- Visitech – Data Made Simple
- California Governor Refused Firefighting Help
- Internet For Drowned Island
- A Toast To President Trump
- 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Green Energy Progress
- Scientists Concerned
- New Data Tampering By NOAA
- Magical Thermometers
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on The End Of “Climate Action”
- arn on “Fascist Salute”
- Disillusioned on Moving To Detroit To Escape Global Warming
- arn on 117 MPH Winds In Ireland
- Brian G Valentine on 117 MPH Winds In Ireland
- Margaret Smith on 117 MPH Winds In Ireland
- Brian G Valentine on The End Of “Climate Action”
- Trevor on The End Of “Climate Action”
- GW on New Arctic Climate Discovered
- Russell Cook on “Fascist Salute”
Environmental and other Socialist taxes and regulation force more + more economic activity away from Europe to emerging markets like China + India where far more CO2 is emitted.
But we still get the blame for importing from those countries!
And that’s about it, in a nutshell.
If every one quit spending we could send the developing countries back into poverty where the Environmental movement wants them. They are pnly Happy when they can show pictures of starving children in foreign countries to get others to give them money under the belief they will use it to help the poor. Look at all the money people send now for the “Starving” animals that is eaten up by “Administrative” Costs.
Why does your headline say; “EU Hoping For UK Economic Depression” and the article you link to as ‘evidence’ says nothing about hoping for economic depression?
Some of the readers are able to put two and two together. Obviously not all though.
Some people still mange to get 5.
The article does not say what you need it to say to support you claim – pure and simple.
It is obvious that many in the eco-loony brigade would be more than happy to see economic activity curtailed.
Indeed it does not take a genius to work out that this is exactly what is already happening as a result of their policies currently in place.
But the article does not mention the ‘eco-loony brigade’, it is all a straw man.