Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Timo, Not that one on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
Environmental and other Socialist taxes and regulation force more + more economic activity away from Europe to emerging markets like China + India where far more CO2 is emitted.
But we still get the blame for importing from those countries!
And that’s about it, in a nutshell.
If every one quit spending we could send the developing countries back into poverty where the Environmental movement wants them. They are pnly Happy when they can show pictures of starving children in foreign countries to get others to give them money under the belief they will use it to help the poor. Look at all the money people send now for the “Starving” animals that is eaten up by “Administrative” Costs.
Why does your headline say; “EU Hoping For UK Economic Depression” and the article you link to as ‘evidence’ says nothing about hoping for economic depression?
Some of the readers are able to put two and two together. Obviously not all though.
Some people still mange to get 5.
The article does not say what you need it to say to support you claim – pure and simple.
It is obvious that many in the eco-loony brigade would be more than happy to see economic activity curtailed.
Indeed it does not take a genius to work out that this is exactly what is already happening as a result of their policies currently in place.
But the article does not mention the ‘eco-loony brigade’, it is all a straw man.