Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “No One Is Above The Law”
- CNN Experts Discuss Medicine
- Looking For Their Lost Keys
- Rapid Climate Change
- CBS News 1982 : One Fourth Of Florida To Drown
- Affordable Transportation
- “Why Scientific Fraud Is Suddenly Everywhere”
- She Hates Her State
- Climate Friendly War
- Office Of Climate Change And Health Equity And Environmental Justice
- “100% Non-Carbon By 2030”
- 1991 : United Nations Calls For Genocide
- Mainstream Fascism In Academia
- California Finds A New Way To Drive Businesses Out
- Powerful Climate Mathematics
- NY Times – Cameras Are Racist
- Forests Cause Forest Fires
- Climate Engineering
- The World’s Worst Scientists
- “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
Recent Comments
- Laurie on “No One Is Above The Law”
- Laurie on “No One Is Above The Law”
- Disillusioned on “No One Is Above The Law”
- Michael Peinsipp on “No One Is Above The Law”
- arn on “No One Is Above The Law”
- Laurie on “No One Is Above The Law”
- Gamecock on “No One Is Above The Law”
- Disillusioned on “No One Is Above The Law”
- Disillusioned on “No One Is Above The Law”
- Disillusioned on “No One Is Above The Law”
Environmental and other Socialist taxes and regulation force more + more economic activity away from Europe to emerging markets like China + India where far more CO2 is emitted.
But we still get the blame for importing from those countries!
And that’s about it, in a nutshell.
If every one quit spending we could send the developing countries back into poverty where the Environmental movement wants them. They are pnly Happy when they can show pictures of starving children in foreign countries to get others to give them money under the belief they will use it to help the poor. Look at all the money people send now for the “Starving” animals that is eaten up by “Administrative” Costs.
Why does your headline say; “EU Hoping For UK Economic Depression” and the article you link to as ‘evidence’ says nothing about hoping for economic depression?
Some of the readers are able to put two and two together. Obviously not all though.
Some people still mange to get 5.
The article does not say what you need it to say to support you claim – pure and simple.
It is obvious that many in the eco-loony brigade would be more than happy to see economic activity curtailed.
Indeed it does not take a genius to work out that this is exactly what is already happening as a result of their policies currently in place.
But the article does not mention the ‘eco-loony brigade’, it is all a straw man.