Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
Recent Comments
- Bob G on “most secure in American history”
- arn on Climate Correlation
- arn on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- arn on “most secure in American history”
- conrad ziefle on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- conrad ziefle on “most secure in American history”
- oeman50 on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- dm on “most secure in American history”
- Dave Burton on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- Tel on “most secure in American history”
Environmental and other Socialist taxes and regulation force more + more economic activity away from Europe to emerging markets like China + India where far more CO2 is emitted.
But we still get the blame for importing from those countries!
And that’s about it, in a nutshell.
If every one quit spending we could send the developing countries back into poverty where the Environmental movement wants them. They are pnly Happy when they can show pictures of starving children in foreign countries to get others to give them money under the belief they will use it to help the poor. Look at all the money people send now for the “Starving” animals that is eaten up by “Administrative” Costs.
Why does your headline say; “EU Hoping For UK Economic Depression” and the article you link to as ‘evidence’ says nothing about hoping for economic depression?
Some of the readers are able to put two and two together. Obviously not all though.
Some people still mange to get 5.
The article does not say what you need it to say to support you claim – pure and simple.
It is obvious that many in the eco-loony brigade would be more than happy to see economic activity curtailed.
Indeed it does not take a genius to work out that this is exactly what is already happening as a result of their policies currently in place.
But the article does not mention the ‘eco-loony brigade’, it is all a straw man.