Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on “Why Do You Resist?”
Quoted in the UK!!!!
Of course you base your arguments on scientific practices rather than the clamors of the Chicken Little Brigade!
Maybe I should add that you tend to show the absurdity of the clamoring!
lmao “expert” fire.
You didn’t even manage to graph the records on the same baseline.
It’s ‘the hottest year on record’, as long as you don’t take its temperature
Nice.
US blogs Real Science and Watts Up With That
Very nice! This is very cool. To be mentioned next to WattUpWithThat—-congratulations!
his (i.e., James Hansen) state-sponsored temperature record is still the one cited by politicians and the media to support their belief that this is the “hottest year in history”.
i.e., political propaganda temperature record
They will probably say this is the hottest December on record. Hot, cold or in-between, every month is the hottest on record!
giss and hadcrut are not real empirical evidence.
that was my second tipoff following climate gate. i had been under the impression AGW hypothesis was supported by actual measurements, until i saw how scant data was tortured into a completely virtual product of their algorithms.
when asked on tv why they corrected the wrong way for UHI, the guy kinda turned white and said, “oh i’m a not scientist. i’m just a programmer.”
It’s the same kind of evidence that convicted Captain Dreyfus, or at least it verges on that.
Come to think of it, there was also a consensus in that case, at least in France. (At one time there were only about two dozen Dreyfusards in the entire country.)