The 2007 “sizzling summer” forecast is no longer available on their web site.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Francis Barnett on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- Billyjack on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- conrad ziefle on “pushing nature past its limits”
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- John Francis on Mission Accomplished
And? It’s a three-year archive of press releases. The implication that they’re trying to falsify history is unwarranted.
I am sure the Met would delete the rest of their embarrasing mistakes if they could get away with it.
Those few hundred extra kilobytes of text could overload their disk capacity.
Peter:
You are attempting to be funny here ! Right!
There is no need to implicate that the MET office is trying anything because evidence shows they are not trying but doing.
The MET office has already cost local and regional governments lots of money due to their poor forecasting skills and you want to defend them.
Come back and visit more often because your position statements are so easy to contradict!
“Electricity bills will have to rise by up to £500 a year to pay for a new generation of environmentally friendly power stations, it emerged”
And I will guarantee that the final bill will be much higher.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/8205123/500-on-electricity-bills-to-pay-for-green-energy.html
And on top of that we have the £2 billion plus ” Climate Change Fund” to help 3rd world countries.
And of course the govt itself estimated the cost of its Climate Change Bill to be £18 billion pa.
So we are looking at well over £1000 pa per household just to keep a few pathetic greenies happy.
It helps to “Hide the news” as well as “Hide the decline”.
They burned it in the barbeque.
As I have suggested before, where is measured accountability in science for the continued poor performance of these climate people? They end up erasing or rewriting history to cover their incompetence rather than having to face consequences for poor results. Why do we keep rewarding incompetence? I sure hope the USA isn’t funding these people.