The 2007 “sizzling summer” forecast is no longer available on their web site.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
And? It’s a three-year archive of press releases. The implication that they’re trying to falsify history is unwarranted.
I am sure the Met would delete the rest of their embarrasing mistakes if they could get away with it.
Those few hundred extra kilobytes of text could overload their disk capacity.
Peter:
You are attempting to be funny here ! Right!
There is no need to implicate that the MET office is trying anything because evidence shows they are not trying but doing.
The MET office has already cost local and regional governments lots of money due to their poor forecasting skills and you want to defend them.
Come back and visit more often because your position statements are so easy to contradict!
“Electricity bills will have to rise by up to £500 a year to pay for a new generation of environmentally friendly power stations, it emerged”
And I will guarantee that the final bill will be much higher.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/8205123/500-on-electricity-bills-to-pay-for-green-energy.html
And on top of that we have the £2 billion plus ” Climate Change Fund” to help 3rd world countries.
And of course the govt itself estimated the cost of its Climate Change Bill to be £18 billion pa.
So we are looking at well over £1000 pa per household just to keep a few pathetic greenies happy.
It helps to “Hide the news” as well as “Hide the decline”.
They burned it in the barbeque.
As I have suggested before, where is measured accountability in science for the continued poor performance of these climate people? They end up erasing or rewriting history to cover their incompetence rather than having to face consequences for poor results. Why do we keep rewarding incompetence? I sure hope the USA isn’t funding these people.