The 2007 “sizzling summer” forecast is no longer available on their web site.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- arn on HUD Climate Advisor
- spren on HUD Climate Advisor
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Tel on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Petit_Barde on Ellen Flees To The UK
- dm on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
And? It’s a three-year archive of press releases. The implication that they’re trying to falsify history is unwarranted.
I am sure the Met would delete the rest of their embarrasing mistakes if they could get away with it.
Those few hundred extra kilobytes of text could overload their disk capacity.
Peter:
You are attempting to be funny here ! Right!
There is no need to implicate that the MET office is trying anything because evidence shows they are not trying but doing.
The MET office has already cost local and regional governments lots of money due to their poor forecasting skills and you want to defend them.
Come back and visit more often because your position statements are so easy to contradict!
“Electricity bills will have to rise by up to £500 a year to pay for a new generation of environmentally friendly power stations, it emerged”
And I will guarantee that the final bill will be much higher.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/8205123/500-on-electricity-bills-to-pay-for-green-energy.html
And on top of that we have the £2 billion plus ” Climate Change Fund” to help 3rd world countries.
And of course the govt itself estimated the cost of its Climate Change Bill to be £18 billion pa.
So we are looking at well over £1000 pa per household just to keep a few pathetic greenies happy.
It helps to “Hide the news” as well as “Hide the decline”.
They burned it in the barbeque.
As I have suggested before, where is measured accountability in science for the continued poor performance of these climate people? They end up erasing or rewriting history to cover their incompetence rather than having to face consequences for poor results. Why do we keep rewarding incompetence? I sure hope the USA isn’t funding these people.