That doesn’t even include this year.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gamecock on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
End Point fallacy Steve…oh wait, my station data has something similar 🙂 and 2011 doesn’t look to warm with a cold La Nina happen’n…
The very same decade that was supposed to warm by .20 Celsius.According to the awesome IPCC 2001 report.
LOL
I’m sure the cherry picker police will be arriving soon, telling you how much Minnesota has warmed since 1977.
They’ll probably push the Hockey Stick in our face and ask how how it smells.
hmm…
maybe atmospheric co2 dropped drastically over that time period
let’s see, 15 degree drop, at a conservative 1 degree/295ppm—
according to CAGW hypothesis atmospheric co2 must have dropped 5,925ppm
😉
But don’t you know that all the cold and snow in Minnesota is a result of global warming?