That doesn’t even include this year.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- MLH on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on Perfect Correlation
- Jack the Insider on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
End Point fallacy Steve…oh wait, my station data has something similar 🙂 and 2011 doesn’t look to warm with a cold La Nina happen’n…
The very same decade that was supposed to warm by .20 Celsius.According to the awesome IPCC 2001 report.
LOL
I’m sure the cherry picker police will be arriving soon, telling you how much Minnesota has warmed since 1977.
They’ll probably push the Hockey Stick in our face and ask how how it smells.
hmm…
maybe atmospheric co2 dropped drastically over that time period
let’s see, 15 degree drop, at a conservative 1 degree/295ppm—
according to CAGW hypothesis atmospheric co2 must have dropped 5,925ppm
😉
But don’t you know that all the cold and snow in Minnesota is a result of global warming?