That doesn’t even include this year.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Cooling Minnesota
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Ulric Lyons on Erasing 1921
- gordon vigurs on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- gordon vigurs on Plant Food
- gordon vigurs on Plant Food
- gordon vigurs on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- arn on UK Net Zero
- conrad ziefle on UK Net Zero
- czechlist on UK Net Zero
- Francis Barnett on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
End Point fallacy Steve…oh wait, my station data has something similar 🙂 and 2011 doesn’t look to warm with a cold La Nina happen’n…
The very same decade that was supposed to warm by .20 Celsius.According to the awesome IPCC 2001 report.
LOL
I’m sure the cherry picker police will be arriving soon, telling you how much Minnesota has warmed since 1977.
They’ll probably push the Hockey Stick in our face and ask how how it smells.
hmm…
maybe atmospheric co2 dropped drastically over that time period
let’s see, 15 degree drop, at a conservative 1 degree/295ppm—
according to CAGW hypothesis atmospheric co2 must have dropped 5,925ppm
😉
But don’t you know that all the cold and snow in Minnesota is a result of global warming?