That doesn’t even include this year.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
Recent Comments
- Margaret Smith on UK Officially Sucks
- gordon vigurs on UK Officially Sucks
- arn on UK Officially Sucks
- Terry Shipman on UK Officially Sucks
- Independent on UK Officially Sucks
- arn on Crime In Washington DC
- Bob G on Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- Bob G on Crime In Washington DC
- Bob G on Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- Bob G on Apparently People Like Warm Weather
End Point fallacy Steve…oh wait, my station data has something similar 🙂 and 2011 doesn’t look to warm with a cold La Nina happen’n…
The very same decade that was supposed to warm by .20 Celsius.According to the awesome IPCC 2001 report.
LOL
I’m sure the cherry picker police will be arriving soon, telling you how much Minnesota has warmed since 1977.
They’ll probably push the Hockey Stick in our face and ask how how it smells.
hmm…
maybe atmospheric co2 dropped drastically over that time period
let’s see, 15 degree drop, at a conservative 1 degree/295ppm—
according to CAGW hypothesis atmospheric co2 must have dropped 5,925ppm
😉
But don’t you know that all the cold and snow in Minnesota is a result of global warming?