That doesn’t even include this year.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Earth On Fire
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
Recent Comments
- William on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- William on Earth On Fire
- arn on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Mike on NPR Climate Experts
- Mike on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- mwhite on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
End Point fallacy Steve…oh wait, my station data has something similar 🙂 and 2011 doesn’t look to warm with a cold La Nina happen’n…
The very same decade that was supposed to warm by .20 Celsius.According to the awesome IPCC 2001 report.
LOL
I’m sure the cherry picker police will be arriving soon, telling you how much Minnesota has warmed since 1977.
They’ll probably push the Hockey Stick in our face and ask how how it smells.
hmm…
maybe atmospheric co2 dropped drastically over that time period
let’s see, 15 degree drop, at a conservative 1 degree/295ppm—
according to CAGW hypothesis atmospheric co2 must have dropped 5,925ppm
😉
But don’t you know that all the cold and snow in Minnesota is a result of global warming?