At least 97% of vegetarians prefer not to eat meat.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Earth On Fire
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
Recent Comments
- arn on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Mike on NPR Climate Experts
- Mike on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- mwhite on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
That’s the same excuse the Creationists use.
Of course those biologists all accept evolution. Has nothing to do with evidence, it’s because they all have to subscribe to the idea for grants. Also they are atheist god-haters.
And of course climatologists are all in it for the grants too but are all modern society haters (gonna ban all our cars I heard!)
Who can deny that heat has taken over the planet?
If evolution was conclusively shown to be a fraud, would the vast majority of biologists be in any danger of losing their jobs? I don’t think so. Even the evolutionary specialists could easily find themselves a new niche
But how about if CAGW was conclusively shown to be a fraud? All of the vast sums of money that are currently diverted to climatology and the entire commercial climate change industry (in which many climatologists moonlight) from taxpayers via governments in the form of grants and subsidies will inevitably be cut off. And you think that will have no effect on climatologists’ employment prospects and standard of livings? Do tell us what you think happens to all this largess if it isn’t largely going to support the employment of climatologists in the manner that they have come to expect.
P.S. I’ve never heard any creationist use the argument that you suggest (i.e., that biologists don’t really believe in evolutionary theory, but espouse it because of fear for their jobs). I am inclined to think that you made it up simply in order to manufacture a bogus association with which you hoped to smear sceptics.
It is hard to see what jobs people like Hansen + Jones could actually do if their depts closed down. After all what are they qualified to do?
Nothing.