At least 97% of vegetarians prefer not to eat meat.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The End Of Snow
- 117 MPH Winds In Ireland
- The End Of “Climate Action”
- Data Made Simple – Weather History Part II
- New Arctic Climate Discovered
- Airport Runways Cause Bad Weather
- Flooding Of January 1862
- Moving To Detroit To Escape Global Warming
- Visitech.ai – Data Made Simple – Weather History
- First Tracks In The Snow
- UK Green Energy Record
- UN Is Upset
- “Fascist Salute”
- Record Warmth Of January 1906
- Heat Trapping Difficulties
- Visitech – Data Made Simple – Antarctic Sea Ice
- Visitech – Data Made Simple
- California Governor Refused Firefighting Help
- Internet For Drowned Island
- A Toast To President Trump
- 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Green Energy Progress
- Scientists Concerned
- New Data Tampering By NOAA
- Magical Thermometers
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on The End Of “Climate Action”
- arn on “Fascist Salute”
- Disillusioned on Moving To Detroit To Escape Global Warming
- arn on 117 MPH Winds In Ireland
- Brian G Valentine on 117 MPH Winds In Ireland
- Margaret Smith on 117 MPH Winds In Ireland
- Brian G Valentine on The End Of “Climate Action”
- Trevor on The End Of “Climate Action”
- GW on New Arctic Climate Discovered
- Russell Cook on “Fascist Salute”
That’s the same excuse the Creationists use.
Of course those biologists all accept evolution. Has nothing to do with evidence, it’s because they all have to subscribe to the idea for grants. Also they are atheist god-haters.
And of course climatologists are all in it for the grants too but are all modern society haters (gonna ban all our cars I heard!)
Who can deny that heat has taken over the planet?
If evolution was conclusively shown to be a fraud, would the vast majority of biologists be in any danger of losing their jobs? I don’t think so. Even the evolutionary specialists could easily find themselves a new niche
But how about if CAGW was conclusively shown to be a fraud? All of the vast sums of money that are currently diverted to climatology and the entire commercial climate change industry (in which many climatologists moonlight) from taxpayers via governments in the form of grants and subsidies will inevitably be cut off. And you think that will have no effect on climatologists’ employment prospects and standard of livings? Do tell us what you think happens to all this largess if it isn’t largely going to support the employment of climatologists in the manner that they have come to expect.
P.S. I’ve never heard any creationist use the argument that you suggest (i.e., that biologists don’t really believe in evolutionary theory, but espouse it because of fear for their jobs). I am inclined to think that you made it up simply in order to manufacture a bogus association with which you hoped to smear sceptics.
It is hard to see what jobs people like Hansen + Jones could actually do if their depts closed down. After all what are they qualified to do?
Nothing.