At least 97% of vegetarians prefer not to eat meat.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Science-Free Journalism
- Why Is Venus So Hot?
- Color Or Monochrome?
- AI Doublespeak
- AI Doublespeak
- Net Zero Intelligence
- “The Green Party dropped nearly 9 per cent”
- Fake Record Heat In India
- RFK Jr’s Plan For $12 Gas
- Hockey Match
- Hockey Match
- Giving Proper Credit
- Conspiracy Theory!
- “No One Is Above The Law”
- CNN Experts Discuss Medicine
- Looking For Their Lost Keys
- Rapid Climate Change
- CBS News 1982 : One Fourth Of Florida To Drown
- Affordable Transportation
- “Why Scientific Fraud Is Suddenly Everywhere”
- She Hates Her State
- Climate Friendly War
- Office Of Climate Change And Health Equity And Environmental Justice
- “100% Non-Carbon By 2030”
- 1991 : United Nations Calls For Genocide
Recent Comments
- oeman50 on Science-Free Journalism
- William on Why Is Venus So Hot?
- Michael L Dee on Science-Free Journalism
- Michael L Dee on Science-Free Journalism
- William on Science-Free Journalism
- Gordon Vigurs on Why Is Venus So Hot?
- Gordon Vigurs on Why Is Venus So Hot?
- arn on Science-Free Journalism
- Gordon Vigurs on Science-Free Journalism
- Bob G on Why Is Venus So Hot?
That’s the same excuse the Creationists use.
Of course those biologists all accept evolution. Has nothing to do with evidence, it’s because they all have to subscribe to the idea for grants. Also they are atheist god-haters.
And of course climatologists are all in it for the grants too but are all modern society haters (gonna ban all our cars I heard!)
Who can deny that heat has taken over the planet?
If evolution was conclusively shown to be a fraud, would the vast majority of biologists be in any danger of losing their jobs? I don’t think so. Even the evolutionary specialists could easily find themselves a new niche
But how about if CAGW was conclusively shown to be a fraud? All of the vast sums of money that are currently diverted to climatology and the entire commercial climate change industry (in which many climatologists moonlight) from taxpayers via governments in the form of grants and subsidies will inevitably be cut off. And you think that will have no effect on climatologists’ employment prospects and standard of livings? Do tell us what you think happens to all this largess if it isn’t largely going to support the employment of climatologists in the manner that they have come to expect.
P.S. I’ve never heard any creationist use the argument that you suggest (i.e., that biologists don’t really believe in evolutionary theory, but espouse it because of fear for their jobs). I am inclined to think that you made it up simply in order to manufacture a bogus association with which you hoped to smear sceptics.
It is hard to see what jobs people like Hansen + Jones could actually do if their depts closed down. After all what are they qualified to do?
Nothing.