At least 97% of vegetarians prefer not to eat meat.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
Recent Comments
- Independent on The End Of NetZero
- iggie on UK Officially Sucks
- conrad ziefle on UK Officially Sucks
- James Snook on UK Officially Sucks
- James Snook on UK Officially Sucks
- James Snook on UK Officially Sucks
- John Francis on UK Officially Sucks
- David M Kitting on UK Officially Sucks
- Terry Shipman on UK Officially Sucks
- Reid on UK Officially Sucks
That’s the same excuse the Creationists use.
Of course those biologists all accept evolution. Has nothing to do with evidence, it’s because they all have to subscribe to the idea for grants. Also they are atheist god-haters.
And of course climatologists are all in it for the grants too but are all modern society haters (gonna ban all our cars I heard!)
Who can deny that heat has taken over the planet?
If evolution was conclusively shown to be a fraud, would the vast majority of biologists be in any danger of losing their jobs? I don’t think so. Even the evolutionary specialists could easily find themselves a new niche
But how about if CAGW was conclusively shown to be a fraud? All of the vast sums of money that are currently diverted to climatology and the entire commercial climate change industry (in which many climatologists moonlight) from taxpayers via governments in the form of grants and subsidies will inevitably be cut off. And you think that will have no effect on climatologists’ employment prospects and standard of livings? Do tell us what you think happens to all this largess if it isn’t largely going to support the employment of climatologists in the manner that they have come to expect.
P.S. I’ve never heard any creationist use the argument that you suggest (i.e., that biologists don’t really believe in evolutionary theory, but espouse it because of fear for their jobs). I am inclined to think that you made it up simply in order to manufacture a bogus association with which you hoped to smear sceptics.
It is hard to see what jobs people like Hansen + Jones could actually do if their depts closed down. After all what are they qualified to do?
Nothing.