At least 97% of vegetarians prefer not to eat meat.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Jack the Insider on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
That’s the same excuse the Creationists use.
Of course those biologists all accept evolution. Has nothing to do with evidence, it’s because they all have to subscribe to the idea for grants. Also they are atheist god-haters.
And of course climatologists are all in it for the grants too but are all modern society haters (gonna ban all our cars I heard!)
Who can deny that heat has taken over the planet?
If evolution was conclusively shown to be a fraud, would the vast majority of biologists be in any danger of losing their jobs? I don’t think so. Even the evolutionary specialists could easily find themselves a new niche
But how about if CAGW was conclusively shown to be a fraud? All of the vast sums of money that are currently diverted to climatology and the entire commercial climate change industry (in which many climatologists moonlight) from taxpayers via governments in the form of grants and subsidies will inevitably be cut off. And you think that will have no effect on climatologists’ employment prospects and standard of livings? Do tell us what you think happens to all this largess if it isn’t largely going to support the employment of climatologists in the manner that they have come to expect.
P.S. I’ve never heard any creationist use the argument that you suggest (i.e., that biologists don’t really believe in evolutionary theory, but espouse it because of fear for their jobs). I am inclined to think that you made it up simply in order to manufacture a bogus association with which you hoped to smear sceptics.
It is hard to see what jobs people like Hansen + Jones could actually do if their depts closed down. After all what are they qualified to do?
Nothing.