Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Jehzsa on “pushing nature past its limits”
How far will getting this “commitment to double low-carbon electricity by 2035” when China is slowing refining of rare Earth materials?
Our prez also forgets those shiny new wind turbines, if there is material to build them with, will need new shiny backup of gas and/or coal generating plants when the wind doesn’t blow.
Baghdad Romm
Heck! He forgets that just making and maintaining those shiny new wind turbines requires more use of fossil carbon energy than they will be able to convert wind energy. That Second Law of Thermodynamics, Baby! You gotta love it!!
The problem isn’t the C. of C. planning something bad; the problem is that the C. of C. don’t plan NOT to.
The fatal flaw in this screed is that there are no “subsidies”. There are tax breaks. Allowing one to keep more of their money is not a “subsidy” as it is not the government’s to begin with!