Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
Recent Comments
- arn on Joker And Midnight Toker
- conrad ziefle on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Bob G on Joker And Midnight Toker
- arn on Joker And Midnight Toker
- arn on Joker And Midnight Toker
- arn on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Bob G on Joker And Midnight Toker
- ThurmanZhou on Joker And Midnight Toker
- oeman50 on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Gordon Vigurs on Joker And Midnight Toker
Romm : Chamber Of Commerce Plans To Destroy The Climate
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
How far will getting this “commitment to double low-carbon electricity by 2035” when China is slowing refining of rare Earth materials?
Our prez also forgets those shiny new wind turbines, if there is material to build them with, will need new shiny backup of gas and/or coal generating plants when the wind doesn’t blow.
Baghdad Romm
Heck! He forgets that just making and maintaining those shiny new wind turbines requires more use of fossil carbon energy than they will be able to convert wind energy. That Second Law of Thermodynamics, Baby! You gotta love it!!
The problem isn’t the C. of C. planning something bad; the problem is that the C. of C. don’t plan NOT to.
The fatal flaw in this screed is that there are no “subsidies”. There are tax breaks. Allowing one to keep more of their money is not a “subsidy” as it is not the government’s to begin with!