32 years later, NASA still refuses to admit that warming is due to solar activity.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 1970 – The Beginning Of Time
- Hiding The Heat Of 1934
- ‘malice toward the planet’
- Final Score For The Inflation Reduction Act
- Fraudster Fighting Climate Misinformation
- Ice Free Glacier National Park
- Climate Comedy Cancelled
- Warmest March On Record
- New Climate Metric
- Bad-Faith Trial Misconduct
- Food And Energy Experts
- “Are We Imagining It?”
- The Suffragettes
- Michael Mann Upset
- A Serious Problem
- Miami Drowning
- No Longer The Greatest Existential Threat
- Almost Unanimous Consensus Of Scientists
- Maryland To Drown
- Rapid Virus Mutation
- Wisconsin To Save The Planet
- Magical Musk
- “Scientists Forecast”
- “thing of the past” update
- Defunding The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- Ulric Lyons on Hiding The Heat Of 1934
- arn on New Climate Metric
- william on New Climate Metric
- Alastair on Fraudster Fighting Climate Misinformation
- arn on New Climate Metric
- arn on ‘malice toward the planet’
- Bob G on Fraudster Fighting Climate Misinformation
- dearieme on Fraudster Fighting Climate Misinformation
- Mike Peinsipp on Final Score For The Inflation Reduction Act
- Billyjack on Ice Free Glacier National Park
That’s strange…
In 1979 we knew that these warming cycles existed when the sun emits more heat…….
..now we know that the sun has nothing to do with it /sarc
had long been looking for this! thanks!
Explains a lot about NASA, doesn’t it ;^)
you think? LOL
Steve, do you have the link for that?
I want to save it and post it on Anthony’s
It is at the bottom of the post http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=L7vk9XBBNxgC&dat=19890509&printsec=frontpage
thanks, I’m putting that away for later, good catch
Is this the diurnal bulge we’re talking about?
Is there data on satellite drag going back 30 years? This would be an interesting independent proxy measurement of atmospheric temperature trends, to compare with UAH/RSS measurements.
Are there any astronomers at NASA any more?
This one is epic LOL Thanks, I don’t recall having seen this one before!
It has been common knowledge among space buffs, that Skylab had fallen to Earth due to the atmosphere not behaving as mandated by the latest “forecasts”.
And yes, there is some epic, a whiff of a Greek Tragedy in seeing the last hardware from the glorious days of Apollo getting destroyed by the inability by Earth-obsessed “New Nasa” to understand the limit of its knowledge.
Pingback: 24 Hours of Climate Reality: Gore-a-thon – Hour 10 | Watts Up With That?