32 years later, NASA still refuses to admit that warming is due to solar activity.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Mike Peinsipp on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Mike Peinsipp on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Disillusioned on Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Disillusioned on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Gamecock on Mann Says He Was Correct
- toorightmate on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Robert Denby on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Michael Abbott on “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- _Jim on Mann Says He Was Correct
That’s strange…
In 1979 we knew that these warming cycles existed when the sun emits more heat…….
..now we know that the sun has nothing to do with it /sarc
had long been looking for this! thanks!
Explains a lot about NASA, doesn’t it ;^)
you think? LOL
Steve, do you have the link for that?
I want to save it and post it on Anthony’s
It is at the bottom of the post http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=L7vk9XBBNxgC&dat=19890509&printsec=frontpage
thanks, I’m putting that away for later, good catch
Is this the diurnal bulge we’re talking about?
Is there data on satellite drag going back 30 years? This would be an interesting independent proxy measurement of atmospheric temperature trends, to compare with UAH/RSS measurements.
Are there any astronomers at NASA any more?
This one is epic LOL Thanks, I don’t recall having seen this one before!
It has been common knowledge among space buffs, that Skylab had fallen to Earth due to the atmosphere not behaving as mandated by the latest “forecasts”.
And yes, there is some epic, a whiff of a Greek Tragedy in seeing the last hardware from the glorious days of Apollo getting destroyed by the inability by Earth-obsessed “New Nasa” to understand the limit of its knowledge.
Pingback: 24 Hours of Climate Reality: Gore-a-thon – Hour 10 | Watts Up With That?