32 years later, NASA still refuses to admit that warming is due to solar activity.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- Latest Research In Climate Science
- UK Sucking Carbon
- Price-Free Tesla
- Four Years Past The Deadline
- Cooling Minnesota
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
Recent Comments
- arn on UK Sucking Carbon
- arn on UK Sucking Carbon
- Francis Barnett on UK Sucking Carbon
- oeman50 on “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- arn on UK Sucking Carbon
- arn on UK Sucking Carbon
- arn on Latest Research In Climate Science
- Gamecock on Latest Research In Climate Science
- arn on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- gordon vigurs on Latest Research In Climate Science
That’s strange…
In 1979 we knew that these warming cycles existed when the sun emits more heat…….
..now we know that the sun has nothing to do with it /sarc
had long been looking for this! thanks!
Explains a lot about NASA, doesn’t it ;^)
you think? LOL
Steve, do you have the link for that?
I want to save it and post it on Anthony’s
It is at the bottom of the post http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=L7vk9XBBNxgC&dat=19890509&printsec=frontpage
thanks, I’m putting that away for later, good catch
Is this the diurnal bulge we’re talking about?
Is there data on satellite drag going back 30 years? This would be an interesting independent proxy measurement of atmospheric temperature trends, to compare with UAH/RSS measurements.
Are there any astronomers at NASA any more?
This one is epic LOL Thanks, I don’t recall having seen this one before!
It has been common knowledge among space buffs, that Skylab had fallen to Earth due to the atmosphere not behaving as mandated by the latest “forecasts”.
And yes, there is some epic, a whiff of a Greek Tragedy in seeing the last hardware from the glorious days of Apollo getting destroyed by the inability by Earth-obsessed “New Nasa” to understand the limit of its knowledge.
Pingback: 24 Hours of Climate Reality: Gore-a-thon – Hour 10 | Watts Up With That?