32 years later, NASA still refuses to admit that warming is due to solar activity.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Mike Peinsipp on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Mike Peinsipp on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour




That’s strange…
In 1979 we knew that these warming cycles existed when the sun emits more heat…….
..now we know that the sun has nothing to do with it /sarc
had long been looking for this! thanks!
Explains a lot about NASA, doesn’t it ;^)
you think? LOL
Steve, do you have the link for that?
I want to save it and post it on Anthony’s
It is at the bottom of the post http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=L7vk9XBBNxgC&dat=19890509&printsec=frontpage
thanks, I’m putting that away for later, good catch
Is this the diurnal bulge we’re talking about?
Is there data on satellite drag going back 30 years? This would be an interesting independent proxy measurement of atmospheric temperature trends, to compare with UAH/RSS measurements.
Are there any astronomers at NASA any more?
This one is epic LOL Thanks, I don’t recall having seen this one before!
It has been common knowledge among space buffs, that Skylab had fallen to Earth due to the atmosphere not behaving as mandated by the latest “forecasts”.
And yes, there is some epic, a whiff of a Greek Tragedy in seeing the last hardware from the glorious days of Apollo getting destroyed by the inability by Earth-obsessed “New Nasa” to understand the limit of its knowledge.
Pingback: 24 Hours of Climate Reality: Gore-a-thon – Hour 10 | Watts Up With That?