Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Bob G on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Bob G on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Bob G on Fact Checking The New York Times
- arn on Fact Checking The New York Times
- conrad ziefle on Fact Checking The New York Times
- arn on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Bob G on Fact Checking The New York Times
- conrad ziefle on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Bob G on Fact Checking The New York Times
Poor, poor Ministry of Truth are losing track of The Current Truth.
I’m surprised its not “100% of scientists who specialize in climate science…”, because only those scientists that conform to the warmist othodoxy manage to get their papers through the peer review process and therefore become bona-fide “climate scientists”
Is it possible that even climate scientists have a conscience?
Well.. 3% may…
I think the other 3% were too busy counting their research grants to answer properly.
surveys have shown that 97% of scientists that specilize and are active in climate research agree…..
…that 100% of their funding