http://climateprogress.org/2011/02/21/accuweather-joe-bastardi-resigns/
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Diversity Is Our Strength
- dearieme on Diversity Is Our Strength
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Crashex on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on Diversity Is Our Strength
- GeologyJim on Diversity Is Our Strength
- Bill Odom on “a persistent concern”
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
I would go to Climate Progress but it would count as a “hit” on the website and I cannot, in good conscience, do that.
ditto, what Chuck said
Sorry guys, I can’t help but check out the dark side from time to time. It’s strange how so many comments equate Fox news with the skeptic community.
Yes I agree with you suyts, It’s a bad idea to have only one side heard even if it is the dark side, Patients you must have (in my best Yoda voice).
(Too many YODA phrases… Must resist.. Aghhhaa..)
It’s strange how so many comments equate Fox news with the skeptic community.
Global warming: thinking not required.
“not thinking” required
Let us know when your comment is no longer awaiting moderation, Steve!
HAHAAHAHAHAHA, let me know if that gets past moderation.
Playing Climate games
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/playing_climate_games.pdf
suyts says:
February 22, 2011 at 6:06 pm
“HAHAAHAHAHAHA, let me know if that gets past moderation”.
Why do you think he published his question at his own blog.
Great move Steven Goddard.
I read that article and I have to agree with a point he made! which was that Joe Bastardi is a Long Range and Expert Meteorologist.
warmists strike again!
robert honeycutt from skepticalscience.com, the person who some days ago was proved to suffer from google scholar illiteracy by popular technology, spent whole 2 hours studying the report. his conclusion is that the last chapter of the report somehow leads the conclusion of csi into a reversed direction… which i fail to see how.
“According to the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (6), the future changes in the extratropical circulation are? likely to be characterized by increases in the positive phases of the AO (referred to as the Northern Annular Mode (NAM) in the report) over the 21st century as the climate warms. The AO is closely related to the NAO in the Atlantic sector, so we infer that a positive trend in the NAO index would also occur. Therefore, we conclude that the 2009-?2010 blocked, negative phase NAO is an extreme event that is not consistent with the overall upward trend in the NAO index since 1950, and is opposite to the current understanding of projected future change in the NAO.”
any ideas, steven?