Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Mann Says He Was Correct
- conrad ziefle on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Mike Peinsipp on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Mike Peinsipp on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Disillusioned on Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Disillusioned on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Gamecock on Mann Says He Was Correct
- toorightmate on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Robert Denby on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Michael Abbott on “under the Intermediate Scenario”
Maybe that little prong east of Greenland?
The Arctic seems to be concentrating harder this year..
Maybe the Yearly final exams require more concentration this year because the questions are harder! 😉
Waldo is taking Spring Break in the Bahamas!
What you are showing is part of Western Europe! The Arctic moved! Actually to be consistent Climatology redefined “Arctic Region” to now include everything North of 34 N latitude!
If you compare the old region North of 63 to the new region North of 35 you will see that percentage wise there is less ice under the new definition!
You’re right. Virtually the entire North Atlantic Ocean is ice free!!! That’s bound to cause a catastrophic rise in the sea level sooner or later.
Concentrated purple haze all in my eyes.
Good representation of the lack of ice on the Pacific side.
The snow cover representation seems to be nibbling into the sea ice part in some areas, such as the eastern Baltic and near Murmansk. They ought to remove the snow so it’s a better match, otherwise the amount of sea ice seems to be less than it is at first glance. Any reason why you shouldn’t take these images as little more than a “fun guide”
Andy
ZZZZzzzz……….
Any reason to believe following sea ice at all is little more than fun stuff?
If you are interested in facts on global warming, don’t miss:
http://www.globaltempfacts.com