Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Luigi on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Bob G on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- czechlist on 60 Years Of Progress in London
Maybe that little prong east of Greenland?
The Arctic seems to be concentrating harder this year..
Maybe the Yearly final exams require more concentration this year because the questions are harder! 😉
Waldo is taking Spring Break in the Bahamas!
What you are showing is part of Western Europe! The Arctic moved! Actually to be consistent Climatology redefined “Arctic Region” to now include everything North of 34 N latitude!
If you compare the old region North of 63 to the new region North of 35 you will see that percentage wise there is less ice under the new definition!
You’re right. Virtually the entire North Atlantic Ocean is ice free!!! That’s bound to cause a catastrophic rise in the sea level sooner or later.
Concentrated purple haze all in my eyes.
Good representation of the lack of ice on the Pacific side.
The snow cover representation seems to be nibbling into the sea ice part in some areas, such as the eastern Baltic and near Murmansk. They ought to remove the snow so it’s a better match, otherwise the amount of sea ice seems to be less than it is at first glance. Any reason why you shouldn’t take these images as little more than a “fun guide”
Andy
ZZZZzzzz……….
Any reason to believe following sea ice at all is little more than fun stuff?
If you are interested in facts on global warming, don’t miss:
http://www.globaltempfacts.com