Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
Recent Comments
- arn on 100% Wind By 2030
- gordon vigurs on 100% Wind By 2030
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- dm on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Jehzsa on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
Where’s Ice Free Waldo Hiding In The Arctic?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Maybe that little prong east of Greenland?
The Arctic seems to be concentrating harder this year..
Maybe the Yearly final exams require more concentration this year because the questions are harder! 😉
Waldo is taking Spring Break in the Bahamas!
What you are showing is part of Western Europe! The Arctic moved! Actually to be consistent Climatology redefined “Arctic Region” to now include everything North of 34 N latitude!
If you compare the old region North of 63 to the new region North of 35 you will see that percentage wise there is less ice under the new definition!
You’re right. Virtually the entire North Atlantic Ocean is ice free!!! That’s bound to cause a catastrophic rise in the sea level sooner or later.
Concentrated purple haze all in my eyes.
Good representation of the lack of ice on the Pacific side.
The snow cover representation seems to be nibbling into the sea ice part in some areas, such as the eastern Baltic and near Murmansk. They ought to remove the snow so it’s a better match, otherwise the amount of sea ice seems to be less than it is at first glance. Any reason why you shouldn’t take these images as little more than a “fun guide”
Andy
ZZZZzzzz……….
Any reason to believe following sea ice at all is little more than fun stuff?
If you are interested in facts on global warming, don’t miss:
http://www.globaltempfacts.com