Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- Greg in NZ on The End Of Everything
- Bob G on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- Disillusioned on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- Disillusioned on Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Mac on The End Of Everything
- czechlist on The End Of Everything
- arn on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- Peter Carroll on Harris To Win In A Blowout
- arn on Election Results
Once upon a time, sunspots were dark. Thanks to AGW, they’re now white too.
Anyway, since R=k*(10g+s) and g=4, assuming k=1 it means s=34 and that might be due to the large number of white spots for 1195 (on the left edge of the disk)
They would not have changed methods of counting sun spots to fit an agenda! Would they?
No, that’s why they use the same telescope and method as was used 150 years ago.
I lost respect for the Solar Community because of their antics leading up to and during the recent solar minimum. Biased research for the sake of funding is not science!
Mike Davis says: Biased research…
How could you use such a phrase?
Their antics can’t be classed as either biased or research…
The phrases fictional science and fantasy science should be used 🙂