Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Robertvd on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Robertvd on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- John Francis on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- John Francis on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
Once upon a time, sunspots were dark. Thanks to AGW, they’re now white too.
Anyway, since R=k*(10g+s) and g=4, assuming k=1 it means s=34 and that might be due to the large number of white spots for 1195 (on the left edge of the disk)
They would not have changed methods of counting sun spots to fit an agenda! Would they?
No, that’s why they use the same telescope and method as was used 150 years ago.
I lost respect for the Solar Community because of their antics leading up to and during the recent solar minimum. Biased research for the sake of funding is not science!
Mike Davis says: Biased research…
How could you use such a phrase?
Their antics can’t be classed as either biased or research…
The phrases fictional science and fantasy science should be used 🙂