Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
Recent Comments
- Peter Carroll on Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Hank Phillips on Seventeen Years Of Fun
- Hank Phillips on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Scott Allen on Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- conrad ziefle on Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Gordon Vigurs on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Bob G on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- conrad ziefle on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Bob G on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Jack the Insider on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
Once upon a time, sunspots were dark. Thanks to AGW, they’re now white too.
Anyway, since R=k*(10g+s) and g=4, assuming k=1 it means s=34 and that might be due to the large number of white spots for 1195 (on the left edge of the disk)
They would not have changed methods of counting sun spots to fit an agenda! Would they?
No, that’s why they use the same telescope and method as was used 150 years ago.
I lost respect for the Solar Community because of their antics leading up to and during the recent solar minimum. Biased research for the sake of funding is not science!
Mike Davis says: Biased research…
How could you use such a phrase?
Their antics can’t be classed as either biased or research…
The phrases fictional science and fantasy science should be used 🙂