Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gamecock on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
Once upon a time, sunspots were dark. Thanks to AGW, they’re now white too.
Anyway, since R=k*(10g+s) and g=4, assuming k=1 it means s=34 and that might be due to the large number of white spots for 1195 (on the left edge of the disk)
They would not have changed methods of counting sun spots to fit an agenda! Would they?
No, that’s why they use the same telescope and method as was used 150 years ago.
I lost respect for the Solar Community because of their antics leading up to and during the recent solar minimum. Biased research for the sake of funding is not science!
Mike Davis says: Biased research…
How could you use such a phrase?
Their antics can’t be classed as either biased or research…
The phrases fictional science and fantasy science should be used 🙂