No wonder Julia is hysterical.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Gordon Vigurs on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Fred Harwood on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- arn on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Luigi on “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Bob G on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Gordon Vigurs on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Bob G on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- arn on “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Gordon Vigurs on “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
Amazing how many red bits are next to grey bits. GISS uses 1250 km smoothing you said? Astounding coincidence!
Looks like we’re in a period of European/Asian warming…bit like the Medieval Warm Period, eh?
I tried taking the timescale back to 1880 and much of the warming vanishes.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/do_nmap.py?year_last=2011&month_last=04&sat=4&sst=0&type=anoms&mean_gen=0112&year1=1880&year2=2010&base1=1951&base2=1980&radius=250&pol=reg
I opted for the 250km smooth – no ocean – exposes their dodgy warming in Siberia and surreal grid cells over Spitzbergen.
That little white spot on the NW of Oz is Broome, not warming here either
Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive…
Steve, I dobbed you – see
http://blogs.news.com.au/couriermail/andrewbolt/index.php/couriermail/comments/gillard_feels_a_chill/#commentsmore
And, among the comments, you might like the list at
“CraigR replied to Maggie the global warming guru Thatcher
Wed 01 Jun 11 (11:45am)
The theory is every changing with what-ever the climatic weather we have or whether we have any climatic weather or not is the climatic weather we do or not will be the climatic weather man causes.
So the climatic weather we have or not is the “Anthropogenic Climate Change “theory we have.
If a slight warming is occurring it does not prove causation, however a cooling disproves the theory that man’s CO2 is the cause of a warming ….a large portion of AGW advocates claim that it’s all ways up, up and away. You simple can’t continually change the ‘Theory” to suit the circumstances otherwise it’s a self falsifying theory.
anti-AGW crown constantly misrepresent what AGW is?
Misrepresent ???? who’s doing that….. the constant relabeling over the years is amazing …..
Global cooling (GC)
Global dimming (GD)
Global warming (GW)
Man-made global warming (MGW)
Anthropogenic global warming (AGW)
Dangerous global warming (DGW)
Greenhouse effect (GE)
Human induced climate change (HICC)
Human caused climate change (HCCC)
Runaway greenhouse effect (RGE)
Climate change (CC)
Global Climate change (GCC)
Climatic Destabilization (CD)
Dangerous climate change (DCC)
Abrupt climate change (ACC)
Anthropogenic climate change (ACC)
Catastrophic climate change (CCC)
Catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW)
Global heating (GH)
Climate crisis (CC)
Climate destabilization (CD)
Global wierding (GW)
Climate chaos (CC)
Inadvertent climate modification (ICM)
Climate challenge (CC)
Climate disruption (CD)
Global climate disruption (GCD) “
Another Ian, loved the list, and don’t forget:
Climate Emergency
Can we really be accurate to 0.5 of a degree, even with all the sampling number of data points ? Are we even sure a degree resolution reflects reality? If that map had -0.5 to +0.5 as ‘white – no change’ then most of it would be white. Its amazing how much of the red is in areas with next to no measurement too.