No wonder Julia is hysterical.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The World’s Worst Scientists
- “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Australia Permanent Drought Update
- Let Them Burn Wood
- “New computer modeling”
- Climate Destroying Shrimp
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
Recent Comments
- Conrad Ziefle on The World’s Worst Scientists
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Francis Barnett on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Steve Cooksey on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- spren on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Jack the Insider on Doubling Energy Costs
- Conrad Ziefle on Doubling Energy Costs
- Disillusioned on Doubling Energy Costs
- Francis Barnett on Doubling Energy Costs
Amazing how many red bits are next to grey bits. GISS uses 1250 km smoothing you said? Astounding coincidence!
Looks like we’re in a period of European/Asian warming…bit like the Medieval Warm Period, eh?
I tried taking the timescale back to 1880 and much of the warming vanishes.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/do_nmap.py?year_last=2011&month_last=04&sat=4&sst=0&type=anoms&mean_gen=0112&year1=1880&year2=2010&base1=1951&base2=1980&radius=250&pol=reg
I opted for the 250km smooth – no ocean – exposes their dodgy warming in Siberia and surreal grid cells over Spitzbergen.
That little white spot on the NW of Oz is Broome, not warming here either
Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive…
Steve, I dobbed you – see
http://blogs.news.com.au/couriermail/andrewbolt/index.php/couriermail/comments/gillard_feels_a_chill/#commentsmore
And, among the comments, you might like the list at
“CraigR replied to Maggie the global warming guru Thatcher
Wed 01 Jun 11 (11:45am)
The theory is every changing with what-ever the climatic weather we have or whether we have any climatic weather or not is the climatic weather we do or not will be the climatic weather man causes.
So the climatic weather we have or not is the “Anthropogenic Climate Change “theory we have.
If a slight warming is occurring it does not prove causation, however a cooling disproves the theory that man’s CO2 is the cause of a warming ….a large portion of AGW advocates claim that it’s all ways up, up and away. You simple can’t continually change the ‘Theory” to suit the circumstances otherwise it’s a self falsifying theory.
anti-AGW crown constantly misrepresent what AGW is?
Misrepresent ???? who’s doing that….. the constant relabeling over the years is amazing …..
Global cooling (GC)
Global dimming (GD)
Global warming (GW)
Man-made global warming (MGW)
Anthropogenic global warming (AGW)
Dangerous global warming (DGW)
Greenhouse effect (GE)
Human induced climate change (HICC)
Human caused climate change (HCCC)
Runaway greenhouse effect (RGE)
Climate change (CC)
Global Climate change (GCC)
Climatic Destabilization (CD)
Dangerous climate change (DCC)
Abrupt climate change (ACC)
Anthropogenic climate change (ACC)
Catastrophic climate change (CCC)
Catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW)
Global heating (GH)
Climate crisis (CC)
Climate destabilization (CD)
Global wierding (GW)
Climate chaos (CC)
Inadvertent climate modification (ICM)
Climate challenge (CC)
Climate disruption (CD)
Global climate disruption (GCD) “
Another Ian, loved the list, and don’t forget:
Climate Emergency
Can we really be accurate to 0.5 of a degree, even with all the sampling number of data points ? Are we even sure a degree resolution reflects reality? If that map had -0.5 to +0.5 as ‘white – no change’ then most of it would be white. Its amazing how much of the red is in areas with next to no measurement too.