Canberra Has Not Warmed Over The Last 100 Years

8 Responses to Canberra Has Not Warmed Over The Last 100 Years

1. Bruce says:

   May 31, 2011 at 11:14 pm

   Amazing how many red bits are next to grey bits. GISS uses 1250 km smoothing you said? Astounding coincidence!

   Reply
2. Chris Cox says:

   June 1, 2011 at 1:21 am

   Looks like we’re in a period of European/Asian warming…bit like the Medieval Warm Period, eh?

   Reply
3. Warwick Hughes says:

   June 1, 2011 at 3:24 am

   I tried taking the timescale back to 1880 and much of the warming vanishes.
   http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/do_nmap.py?year_last=2011&month_last=04&sat=4&sst=0&type=anoms&mean_gen=0112&year1=1880&year2=2010&base1=1951&base2=1980&radius=250&pol=reg
   I opted for the 250km smooth – no ocean – exposes their dodgy warming in Siberia and surreal grid cells over Spitzbergen.

   Reply
4. Tom Harley says:

   June 1, 2011 at 5:39 am

   That little white spot on the NW of Oz is Broome, not warming here either

   Reply
5. Ozboy says:

   June 1, 2011 at 6:59 am

   Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive…

   Reply
6. Another Ian says:

   June 1, 2011 at 10:52 am

   Steve, I dobbed you – see

   http://blogs.news.com.au/couriermail/andrewbolt/index.php/couriermail/comments/gillard_feels_a_chill/#commentsmore

   And, among the comments, you might like the list at

   “CraigR replied to Maggie the global warming guru Thatcher
   Wed 01 Jun 11 (11:45am)
   The theory is every changing with what-ever the climatic weather we have or whether we have any climatic weather or not is the climatic weather we do or not will be the climatic weather man causes.
   So the climatic weather we have or not is the “Anthropogenic Climate Change “theory we have.

   If a slight warming is occurring it does not prove causation, however a cooling disproves the theory that man’s CO2 is the cause of a warming ….a large portion of AGW advocates claim that it’s all ways up, up and away. You simple can’t continually change the ‘Theory” to suit the circumstances otherwise it’s a self falsifying theory.

   anti-AGW crown constantly misrepresent what AGW is?

   Misrepresent ???? who’s doing that….. the constant relabeling over the years is amazing …..

   Global cooling (GC)
   Global dimming (GD)
   Global warming (GW)
   Man-made global warming (MGW)
   Anthropogenic global warming (AGW)
   Dangerous global warming (DGW)
   Greenhouse effect (GE)
   Human induced climate change (HICC)
   Human caused climate change (HCCC)
   Runaway greenhouse effect (RGE)
   Climate change (CC)
   Global Climate change (GCC)
   Climatic Destabilization (CD)
   Dangerous climate change (DCC)
   Abrupt climate change (ACC)
   Anthropogenic climate change (ACC)
   Catastrophic climate change (CCC)
   Catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW)
   Global heating (GH)
   Climate crisis (CC)
   Climate destabilization (CD)
   Global wierding (GW)
   Climate chaos (CC)
   Inadvertent climate modification (ICM)
   Climate challenge (CC)
   Climate disruption (CD)
   Global climate disruption (GCD) “

   Reply
7. EH Lee says:

   June 1, 2011 at 11:03 am

   Another Ian, loved the list, and don’t forget:

   Climate Emergency

   Reply
8. Charlie says:

   June 2, 2011 at 5:16 am

   Can we really be accurate to 0.5 of a degree, even with all the sampling number of data points ? Are we even sure a degree resolution reflects reality? If that map had -0.5 to +0.5 as ‘white – no change’ then most of it would be white. Its amazing how much of the red is in areas with next to no measurement too.

   Reply