NEVADA NORTHERN GREAT BASIN ......................... 4 of 4 224 142 SNAKE RIVER .................................. 3 of 3 188 139 OWYHEE RIVER ................................. 5 of 6 191 132 UPPER HUMBOLDT RIVER ......................... 5 of 5 257 147 LOWER HUMBOLDT RIVER ......................... 4 of 6 182 143 CLOVER VALLEY ................................ 1 of 1 247 149 EASTERN NEVADA ............................... 3 of 3 258 149
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
Recent Comments
- arn on 100% Wind By 2030
- gordon vigurs on 100% Wind By 2030
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- dm on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Jehzsa on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
Everyone knows that the snowpack measurements need to be adjusted to compensate for ‘anthropocene’ snow. I would not be surprised if GISS is about to submit a paper on the required correction, which will bring the snowpack measurements more into line with the global climate model Nevada-area seasonal multi-decadal predictions…
That snowpack may grow some more in the next few days.
What Andy said.
We have a front moving through Northern California. It must be one of those climate change type storms, because it’s nearing 61 degrees outside!!!
If it were a normal storm we’d be in the low 80’s.
The 221% number assumes equal areas, either that or the differences in area cancel out exactly.
Nitpicking yes, but wanted to bring it up before a CAGW believer did. Now they’ll have to resort to the large snowpacks being “predicted” by the IPCC and completely in line with CAGW.
-Scott