NEVADA NORTHERN GREAT BASIN ......................... 4 of 4 224 142 SNAKE RIVER .................................. 3 of 3 188 139 OWYHEE RIVER ................................. 5 of 6 191 132 UPPER HUMBOLDT RIVER ......................... 5 of 5 257 147 LOWER HUMBOLDT RIVER ......................... 4 of 6 182 143 CLOVER VALLEY ................................ 1 of 1 247 149 EASTERN NEVADA ............................... 3 of 3 258 149
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
Recent Comments
- arn on Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- Francis Barnett on Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- Francis Barnett on 622 billion tons of new ice
- conrad ziefle on The Other Side Of The Pond
- Bob G on The Other Side Of The Pond
- Mike Haseler (Scottish Sceptic) on Big Pharma Sales Tool
- gordon vigurs on The Other Side Of The Pond
- arn on The Other Side Of The Pond
- Bob G on Deadliest US Tornado Days
- Bob G on The Other Side Of The Pond
Everyone knows that the snowpack measurements need to be adjusted to compensate for ‘anthropocene’ snow. I would not be surprised if GISS is about to submit a paper on the required correction, which will bring the snowpack measurements more into line with the global climate model Nevada-area seasonal multi-decadal predictions…
That snowpack may grow some more in the next few days.
What Andy said.
We have a front moving through Northern California. It must be one of those climate change type storms, because it’s nearing 61 degrees outside!!!
If it were a normal storm we’d be in the low 80’s.
The 221% number assumes equal areas, either that or the differences in area cancel out exactly.
Nitpicking yes, but wanted to bring it up before a CAGW believer did. Now they’ll have to resort to the large snowpacks being “predicted” by the IPCC and completely in line with CAGW.
-Scott