NEVADA NORTHERN GREAT BASIN ......................... 4 of 4 224 142 SNAKE RIVER .................................. 3 of 3 188 139 OWYHEE RIVER ................................. 5 of 6 191 132 UPPER HUMBOLDT RIVER ......................... 5 of 5 257 147 LOWER HUMBOLDT RIVER ......................... 4 of 6 182 143 CLOVER VALLEY ................................ 1 of 1 247 149 EASTERN NEVADA ............................... 3 of 3 258 149
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
- If An Academic Said It, It Must Be True
- Record Snow Cover
- Stopping Climate Misinformation
- Arctic Ice Free In Two Years
- “Decades Of Scientific Research”
- The Atlantic : Tesla Bombings Not Politics Or Terrorism
- Tough Times For Eco-Terrorists
- EV Mandates
- “Oswald is a patsy. They set him up”
- In This House We Believe In Science
- “BEAUTIFUL, CLEAN COAL”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Net Zero In China
- Bob G on Net Zero In China
- conrad ziefle on Net Zero In China
- william on Make America Healthy Again
- arn on Make America Healthy Again
- Gerald Machnee on Grok Defending Climategate
- dearieme on Nobel Prophecy Update
- Russell Cook on Make America Healthy Again
- Allan Shelton on Make America Healthy Again
- Bill Odom on Net Zero In China
Everyone knows that the snowpack measurements need to be adjusted to compensate for ‘anthropocene’ snow. I would not be surprised if GISS is about to submit a paper on the required correction, which will bring the snowpack measurements more into line with the global climate model Nevada-area seasonal multi-decadal predictions…
That snowpack may grow some more in the next few days.
What Andy said.
We have a front moving through Northern California. It must be one of those climate change type storms, because it’s nearing 61 degrees outside!!!
If it were a normal storm we’d be in the low 80’s.
The 221% number assumes equal areas, either that or the differences in area cancel out exactly.
Nitpicking yes, but wanted to bring it up before a CAGW believer did. Now they’ll have to resort to the large snowpacks being “predicted” by the IPCC and completely in line with CAGW.
-Scott