NEVADA NORTHERN GREAT BASIN ......................... 4 of 4 224 142 SNAKE RIVER .................................. 3 of 3 188 139 OWYHEE RIVER ................................. 5 of 6 191 132 UPPER HUMBOLDT RIVER ......................... 5 of 5 257 147 LOWER HUMBOLDT RIVER ......................... 4 of 6 182 143 CLOVER VALLEY ................................ 1 of 1 247 149 EASTERN NEVADA ............................... 3 of 3 258 149
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Timo, Not that one on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
Everyone knows that the snowpack measurements need to be adjusted to compensate for ‘anthropocene’ snow. I would not be surprised if GISS is about to submit a paper on the required correction, which will bring the snowpack measurements more into line with the global climate model Nevada-area seasonal multi-decadal predictions…
That snowpack may grow some more in the next few days.
What Andy said.
We have a front moving through Northern California. It must be one of those climate change type storms, because it’s nearing 61 degrees outside!!!
If it were a normal storm we’d be in the low 80’s.
The 221% number assumes equal areas, either that or the differences in area cancel out exactly.
Nitpicking yes, but wanted to bring it up before a CAGW believer did. Now they’ll have to resort to the large snowpacks being “predicted” by the IPCC and completely in line with CAGW.
-Scott