http://news.google.com/newspapers
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gamecock on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Luigi on Climate Attribution Model
More “questionable” figures, probably.. Dontcha know that severe weather never happened before AGW????
Exactly … Steve must believe in Batboy.
P.S. I’m still laughing from your “ooh, ooh, can I be Ill Wind Blowing” … priceless!
The Yangtze also flooded like this exactly 100 years ago, in 1911; according to some websites, about 3.7 million people were left homeless at that time – via Google News, I’m looking at a page from the Montreal Gazette from 7th Oct 1911, which gives a figure of 10,000 as having drowned (other sources say 100,000 deaths, overall) and more than a million facing starvation. There is no doubt that if a repeat happened this year, these people would be called “climate refugees” by the world’s media, and we’d be told that the situation called for urgent action on CO2.
“we’d be told that the situation called for urgent action on CO2.”
It would accelerate their nutty demands for carbon rations, which have already been proposed in the UK and Australia.