Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Robertvd on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
1931 : 350,000 Killed By Flood In China, Millions Destitute
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.



More “questionable” figures, probably.. Dontcha know that severe weather never happened before AGW????
Exactly … Steve must believe in Batboy.
P.S. I’m still laughing from your “ooh, ooh, can I be Ill Wind Blowing” … priceless!
The Yangtze also flooded like this exactly 100 years ago, in 1911; according to some websites, about 3.7 million people were left homeless at that time – via Google News, I’m looking at a page from the Montreal Gazette from 7th Oct 1911, which gives a figure of 10,000 as having drowned (other sources say 100,000 deaths, overall) and more than a million facing starvation. There is no doubt that if a repeat happened this year, these people would be called “climate refugees” by the world’s media, and we’d be told that the situation called for urgent action on CO2.
“we’d be told that the situation called for urgent action on CO2.”
It would accelerate their nutty demands for carbon rations, which have already been proposed in the UK and Australia.