Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- John Francis on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gamecock on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
If Hansen said it never happened til now, then damn it, that’s good enough for Mr Duncan. Unless he did not say it, then it is still OK with Mr Duncan.
Are there any satellite photos to show that condition? 😉
Steve,
Again, I suggest you read the actual article.
” it may safely be assumed that the Polar basin is not during the whole summer or autumn covered with CONTINUOUS ice
It is, in fact, evident that the sea shows large tracts of open spaces during these seasons.”
That does not sound like an ice free arctic either. Of course if Hansen or others have been saying that until the 1880’s the arctic was covered with continuous ice, you have totally exposed them.
Prior to 1989, the Arctic was covered with 10 metre ice. Everyone knows that.
And Polar Bears were vegans, who dined on lichens and sedges.