Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
Recent Comments
- Margaret Smith on “a persistent concern”
- arn on Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- Francis Barnett on Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- Francis Barnett on 622 billion tons of new ice
- conrad ziefle on The Other Side Of The Pond
- Bob G on The Other Side Of The Pond
- Mike Haseler (Scottish Sceptic) on Big Pharma Sales Tool
- gordon vigurs on The Other Side Of The Pond
- arn on The Other Side Of The Pond
- Bob G on Deadliest US Tornado Days
1926 : Geoengineering A Warmer Climate
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
I just had to read that whole article! What is being proposed today is about of equal value.
The entire East Coast would be as warm as Southern California. That is just so wonderful! They should have forged ahead with proposal number two! It could have provided a warmer Europe and eastern North America. If they had figured out how to breed pigs with turkeys we could possibly have flying pigs today also! Or at minimum Ham and Turkey for Christmas all from one animal.
I was thinking that this plan is questionable.
If we dam up the flows of warm water to the arctic and isolate it perhaps it would grow by massive amounts instead.
However, if someone can think of a fool-proof plan to melt the damn thing, I mean completely, I would vote for it.
There is a possibility that melting the Arctic would result in a colder Northern Hemisphere and a return of major glaciation.
The best answer to Geo-engineering plans and the Precautionary Principle is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZbKHDPPrrc