Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Disillusioned on Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Disillusioned on Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Gamecock on CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- dearieme on COP29 Preview
- Greg in NZ on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on A Giant Eyesore
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
- arn on UK Labour To Save The Planet
- Tel on UK Labour To Save The Planet
1926 : Geoengineering A Warmer Climate
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
I just had to read that whole article! What is being proposed today is about of equal value.
The entire East Coast would be as warm as Southern California. That is just so wonderful! They should have forged ahead with proposal number two! It could have provided a warmer Europe and eastern North America. If they had figured out how to breed pigs with turkeys we could possibly have flying pigs today also! Or at minimum Ham and Turkey for Christmas all from one animal.
I was thinking that this plan is questionable.
If we dam up the flows of warm water to the arctic and isolate it perhaps it would grow by massive amounts instead.
However, if someone can think of a fool-proof plan to melt the damn thing, I mean completely, I would vote for it.
There is a possibility that melting the Arctic would result in a colder Northern Hemisphere and a return of major glaciation.
The best answer to Geo-engineering plans and the Precautionary Principle is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZbKHDPPrrc