Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Timo, Not that one on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
1926 : Geoengineering A Warmer Climate
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.


I just had to read that whole article! What is being proposed today is about of equal value.
The entire East Coast would be as warm as Southern California. That is just so wonderful! They should have forged ahead with proposal number two! It could have provided a warmer Europe and eastern North America. If they had figured out how to breed pigs with turkeys we could possibly have flying pigs today also! Or at minimum Ham and Turkey for Christmas all from one animal.
I was thinking that this plan is questionable.
If we dam up the flows of warm water to the arctic and isolate it perhaps it would grow by massive amounts instead.
However, if someone can think of a fool-proof plan to melt the damn thing, I mean completely, I would vote for it.
There is a possibility that melting the Arctic would result in a colder Northern Hemisphere and a return of major glaciation.
The best answer to Geo-engineering plans and the Precautionary Principle is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZbKHDPPrrc