[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BQpciw8suk&feature=player_embedded]
.
“They (Mann et al) are not allowed to do this in science. This is not up to our standards”
The NSF verdict on Mann shows just how corrupt the science establishment is.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- Greg in NZ on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- czechlist on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- arn on COP29 Preview
- arn on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
Steve, those two slides he showed there would make a nice animated GIF blink graph.
Doesn’t this guy believe in Global Warming though? Or am I thinking of someone else?
He is one of those that thinks they are a “LukeWarmer” The “Science” is right but the presentation is wrong!
Unless he has changed his stripes he still believes in Global Warming but he is not alone as there are a group of MOR that think both sides are right to a point and compromise should be reached to settle the science!
Whether he believes in Global Warming or not, he seems to believe science should be done properly.
As Global warming does not even qualify as an Hypothesis as it s not testable which leaves it an opinion or assumption there is nothing to believe in.
By Global Warming I am referring to Human Induced Climate Catastrophe that must be addressed in some manner.
By attempting to “Fix” the surface temperature record he is on a fool’s errand!
I have done an analysis supporting the Mueller case which is viewable here:
http://www.richardbird.info/climatechangegraph1.htm
Is Mikey still making it rain (grants) at Penn State? When the money dries up, this rock star’s stock is really going to drop.
Didn’t I see sometime back that there was an earlier portion of that data that ALSO didn’t agree with the narrative and was NOT included as well?
Muller is a geo-engineering salesman.
BEST is Muller’s effort to peddle geo-engineering by the Novim group.
Muller and his BEST project is a front for a geo-engineering company that probably wants to partake in the CO2 tax feeding
frenzy. He’s got a job to do.
http://jer-skepticscorner.blogspot.com/2011/04/best-novim-and-other-solution.html
This is Muller’s own company:
http://www.mullerandassociates.com/index.php
I do not know if any of you are familiar with Greg Laden’s blog, it is a strange place indeed.
This is what I posted regarding his thoughts on M. Mann when he changed the links:
I am getting a first hand look at some of the AGW crowds dishonesty on this blog that Greg maintains. If such small players can’t stand the truth, then it is no wonder that the ones in the big leagues are total lying, dishonest folks. It is somewhat ironic that basically this was all about honesty and now we get an example of that when some one changes a posters links. In other words, data tampering. Is that being honest?
This is what he distorted it into.
19
I am getting a first hand look at some of the AGW shits dishonesty on this shit blog that Greg maintains. If such small players can’t stand the truth, then it is no wonder that the ones in the big leagues are total lying, dishonest shits. Lying shits.
Posted by: John D. Swallow | August 24, 2011 6:46 AM
http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/08/hockey_stick_data_tampering_in.php
My reply to him: Do you call that being honest? Is this consistent with the AGW crowd’s method of operation? It would seem so and I thank you for reinforcing this belief and you will not have to worry about blocking me because why would I want to ever visit the site of such a dishonest and ignorant person who has a degree that, along with a dollar, can get you a cup of coffee about anywhere. It is a good thing that your wife works or you would be out on the street where you probably belong.
These are the links that he substituted for the ones that appear.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1235395/SPECIAL-INVESTIGATION-Climate-change-emails-row-deepens–Russians-admit-DID-send-them.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BQpciw8suk
http://judithcurry.com/2011/02/22/hiding-the-decline/
It might be a good time to give Greg a bit of a wake up call.